日韩精品久久一区二区三区_亚洲色图p_亚洲综合在线最大成人_国产中出在线观看_日韩免费_亚洲综合在线一区

Global EditionASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
HongKong Comment(1)

Annoying telemarketing calls require assertive regulation

HK Edition | Updated: 2017-08-30 06:02
Share
Share - WeChat

Many people in Hong Kong, including myself, are very disturbed by the annoying person-to-person telemarketing calls we receive every day. These calls are mostly from financial institutions and beauty companies and are often made at around lunch and dinner time. Obviously, most of us do not require nor are interested in their products and services. Moreover, telephone frauds have been rampant in recent months, which make the public feel even more intolerant toward calls from strangers. As a result, there are growing voices in the community for strengthening regulation of telemarketing calls. It should be noted that telemarketing calls from voice machines, text messages and emails have been effectively banned in Hong Kong since the introduction of "Do-not-call Registers" by the Office of the Communications Authority around 10 years ago, where members of the public who added their phone numbers onto the registers can block themselves from irritating calls generated by computers. The government recently launched a public consultation on regulation of person-to-person telemarketing calls.

The consultation paper sets out three possible policy options - enhancing the trade-specific self-regulatory regime, promoting the use of call-filtering applications in smartphones and establishing a statutory "Do-not-call Register". Should option one be implemented, I believe that basically nothing will change. Having a trade-specific regulatory regime has not been successful in many other sectors, such as regulation of light pollution by giant advertising billboards in Causeway Bay and other commercial areas. If self-regulation were effective, we should have received fewer cold calls. In other words, it cannot reduce the nuisance suffered by the public nor enhance the effectiveness of the telemarketing companies, so I do not think it is worth considering.

The second option is promoting the use of call-filtering applications in smartphones and encouraging users to install apps that would block unwelcome phone calls. I have personally installed an app that does indeed bar some but not all of those unwelcome calls. Moreover, the quality and effectiveness of these apps are uncertain. The merit of the proposal is that a government-created app would have better quality and features that can help the public identify person-to-person telemarketing calls. Moreover, it can screen out uninterested consumers and increase the effectiveness of the telemarketing companies. The biggest weakness of this suggestion is that it does not apply to land-line phones and non-smartphone mobile phone users. While most of us have smartphones nowadays, it cannot be ignored that there are a still significant number of people in Hong Kong that have a land-line at home and use mobile phones with no internet connection. It would be grossly unfair to them if the new measures to regulate person-to-person telemarketing calls exclude them completely. In short, it can only be a supplementary solution.

Establishing a statutory "Do-not-call Register" is no doubt the most effective way. The "Do-not-call Register" for electronic phone calls and messages had a database of 2.9 million last year compared with 1.5 million in 2008 when it was first introduced. During the same period, the number of related complaints fell from 8,792 to only 791, which clearly demonstrated the significant progress achieved. Some unscrupulous merchants may be tempted to circumvent the register by using overseas call centers or internet phone numbers but overseas experience has shown that extending criminal responsibility to the end beneficiary would be enough to deter most violators.

The consultant commissioned by the government said there are about 40 telemarketing companies in Hong Kong. There are around 7,000 people directly or indirectly engaged in person-to-person telemarketing and they make about 210,000 unsolicited calls daily. Assuming the estimate is accurate, it is shocking that there are so many people involved in this line of business. It also explains why the government has been reluctant to enforce an outright ban on person-to-person telemarketing for fear of creating unemployment. However, in today's robust employment market, it would not be difficult for these employees to find new jobs, or better yet, the government could subsidize job retraining and work with public bodies such as the Employees Retraining Board or Vocational Training Council.

Therefore, I urge the government to amend the Unsolicited Electronic Messages Ordinance soon and to set up a "Do-not-call Register" for person-to-person telemarketing. The threshold of conviction should not be high and a stiff fine should be imposed on the end beneficiary as well as the telemarketing companies. Moreover, there needs to be a clear definition for person-to-person telemarketing, including harassment calls and soundless calls. Obviously, business and organizations that receive prior written approval should be allowed to call their members, clients and customers. Calls from non-profit organizations and polling agencies should also be exempted. Person-to-person telemarketing to the land-line of companies should not be discouraged.

I believe that regulating person-to-person telemarketing with new legislation can reduce the disturbance to the public, enhance consumers' rights, protect personal privacy and increase the efficiency and effectiveness of marketing. The government should act hastily to draft new legislation to protect the public interest.

(HK Edition 08/30/2017 page7)

 

Today's Top News

Editor's picks

Most Viewed

Top
BACK TO THE TOP
English
Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
主站蜘蛛池模板: 亚洲国产精品久久久久久网站 | 性生潮久久久不久久久久 | 亚洲阿v天堂2021在线观看 | 久草视频在线资源站 | 免费xxxx日本大片在线观看 | 成人免费在线 | 久久久久久久免费看 | 国产精品视频二区不卡 | 久操不卡 | 亚洲精品一区二区三区在线观看 | 精品欧美一区二区三区久久久 | 黄色网址你懂的 | 性夜影院爽黄a爽在线看香蕉 | 美女羞羞网站妖精视频 | 中文精品在线 | 久久久久免费 | 成人爽a毛片免费啪啪红桃视频 | 久久er精品| 婷婷久久综合网 | 超碰在线观看97 | 国产精选91热在线观看 | 免费免费视频片在线观看 | 99久久免费费视频在线观看 | 久久一日本道色综合久久 | www.9cao| 国产成人系列 | 任你操免费视频 | 色在线视频观看 | 国产91在线观看 | 日本欧美日韩 | 国产区久久 | 欧美一级日韩 | 黄视频网站大全 | 亚洲网站在线免费观看 | 国产一区二区三区久久久久久久久 | 香港全黄一级毛片在线播放 | 一级大片免费看 | 国产aaaaa一级毛片 | 国产欧美日韩精品一区 | 国内精品视频在线观看 | 夜夜夜噜噜噜 |