日韩精品久久一区二区三区_亚洲色图p_亚洲综合在线最大成人_国产中出在线观看_日韩免费_亚洲综合在线一区

Global EditionASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
HongKong Comment(1)

More govt intervention in housing justifiable

HK Edition | Updated: 2017-09-18 07:22
Share
Share - WeChat

Based on what Chief Executive Carrie Lam Cheng Yuet-ngor and other top government officials have said in the past several weeks, it has become clear that increased government intervention, especially in housing, is the new norm.

Such a change in economic policy should not have come as a surprise to anyone who has been following the news. Lam and others have repeatedly said a more expansive budget policy, short of deficit financing, is needed to tackle the economic and social challenges that trouble Hong Kong.

In the past, the government was seen to be obsessed with controlling the increase in recurrent expenditure because of Hong Kong's narrow tax base and, more importantly, the aversion to debt financing. For that reason, it was a practice for the government to hand out part of the annual surplus in the form of tax rebates and other one-off incentives.

Some economists and business leaders have called on the government to spend down the fiscal reserve which, at about HK$800 billion, or 24 months of government expenditure, is seen as wastefully high. The question is where and how to spend the public funds?

The answer to that question seems obvious: housing. Previously, the government believed the problem arising from escalating home prices could be solved by increasing the supply of land for developers to build more apartments. That way, the government could make money by selling land while increasing the housing supply.

But the market doesn't work that way. One thing developers fear most is a supply glut, tying up precious capital. Their priority is to control the supply of finished apartments at levels below demand to ensure rising prices. They were helped tremendously by the persistent low borrowing costs and inflow of overseas capital into the property market.

The government has exceeded its land-creation target, but home prices have continued to surge, giving rise to growing public discontent. This has led the government to come to the obvious conclusion that the housing problem can only be solved by a massive public-housing program which can be extremely costly and time-consuming.

There are stopgap measures worth considering. For instance, the government has proposed a plan to increase the supply of better-quality subdivided flats in old apartments in cooperation with non-profit organizations for rental to needy families. The other idea is to allow conversion of old factory buildings into apartments as long as they abide by the established safety and health standards.

These are sound proposals that can bring almost immediate benefits to the many families who cannot afford the price or rental of a decent place to live. But these practical solutions to an immediate problem have drawn criticism from opposition politicians and social radicals although they don't have any alternative plans that can work.

Lam recently made it known that the government has plans to work with private developers to build public housing estates on part of the rural land they own in the New Territories. This is not a new idea. Similar projects in other parts of Hong Kong have shown the arrangement can work to the benefit of both the public and developers.

It makes no sense to be bogged down in arguments about who is going to have a better deal in such cooperation efforts. It is hard to place a monetary value on the social benefits the government can obtain from such arrangements.

In fact, the government has finally got it right by drawing a distinction between the property market and public housing. Believing a greater supply of apartments in the market can bring down prices is just wishful thinking. Past attempts to dampen market prices of properties with administrative and monetary measures have proved futile. The Singapore government realized that long ago.

Other cities, such as Shenzhen, have the option to annex neighboring regions when development space runs out. Hong Kong does not. One of the least costly and disruptive ways to create land for public housing is to reclaim land from the sea. The other is to redevelop some existing public housing estates to increase floor space.

Both these options are under consideration. Money shouldn't be a problem now that the government has summoned the will to spend. But it would still need wide public support for the various projects touching on a host of political and environmental issues.

But most Hong Kong people would agree, it's worth the money and effort to tackle the housing shortage problem that is creating much hardship for many thousands of low-income families.

The author is a veteran current affairs commentator.

(HK Edition 09/18/2017 page8)

Today's Top News

Editor's picks

Most Viewed

Top
BACK TO THE TOP
English
Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
主站蜘蛛池模板: 国产精品不卡视频 | 亚洲午夜无码毛片AV久久 | 天天久久| 嫩草影院永久入口在线观看 | 久福利| 欧美精品一区二区三区蜜桃视频 | 日韩免费毛片 | 天天操天天操天天操香蕉 | 亚洲一区黄色 | 97人人澡人人爽91综合色 | 亚洲视频在线一区 | 男女www视频 | 高清国产福利 | 狠狠色噜噜狠狠狠狠97影音先锋 | 99亚洲精品 | 五月激情综合婷婷 | 台湾一级毛片永久免费 | 一个看片免费视频www | 91官网 | 国产成人一区二区三区 | 亚洲91视频 | 亚洲一区二区免费看 | 91精品最新国内在线播放 | 亚洲国产精品欧美综合 | 免费国产在线视频 | 色秀视频免费网站在线观看 | 成在线人视频免费视频 | 国产精品久久婷婷六月丁香 | 国产精品婷婷久久久久 | 九九九久久国产免费 | 亚洲日韩视频免费观看 | 日韩欧美色综合 | 亚洲视频在线观看免费 | 欧美中文字幕一区二区三区亚洲 | 91蜜芽尤物福利在线观看 | 国产精品视频在线播放 | 欧美大片网站 | 午夜av毛片| 丁香久久 | 欧美在线观看a | 成在线人免费视频 |