日韩精品久久一区二区三区_亚洲色图p_亚洲综合在线最大成人_国产中出在线观看_日韩免费_亚洲综合在线一区

Global EditionASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
HongKong Comment(1)

Business people with vested interests oppose policy changes

HK Edition | Updated: 2017-11-01 05:51
Share
Share - WeChat

The government has summoned up the courage and will to shake loose the constraints of a well-proven economic policy and chart a fresh course deemed necessary to face the myriad new challenges posed by an unfamiliar social and economic environment.

But the important business sector in this traditionally capitalistic town has yet to realize the significance of these inevitable changes. Business people in all the major economic sectors, including finance, property and retail, are still engrossed in the single-minded pursuit of immediate profit at the expense of almost everything else, including their social responsibility.

Some property developers have complained they are being unfairly singled out for public ridicule, arguing that their contributions to housing many thousands of families should not be ignored. They may have a point. Indeed, the major developers were once lionized like sports stars and served as role models to many young people.

Public perception of real-estate tycoons has drastically changed for the worse since home prices surged in the past couple of years. They are widely maligned for profiteering by cornering the supply to push up prices, forcing many families to stretch household budgets to the limit to buy homes.

These developers are now given a chance to build a better image of themselves in the eyes of the public by the government. Instead of supporting the latest government initiatives to provide "affordable" housing for sale to first-time homebuyers, they have largely distanced themselves from the proposal.

 

What's worse, some real-estate agents have openly expressed doubts about the government plan while threatening prospective homebuyers that if they don't buy now with whatever means they can muster, they will never be able to afford doing so later. A property agent was quoted in a mass-circulation newspaper as flatly saying home prices in Hong Kong can only go up irrespective of what the government tries.

Such cynicism can greatly hamper the government plan by deepening public resentment against property developers and raise suspicion that developers will exact a stiff price in exchange for cooperation to build affordable housing on part of the farmland they own in the New Territories. In fact, a little good public relations work on the part of the developers can go a long way in helping smooth the tedious and complicated negotiations over proposed government housing projects.

But it is hard for the developers, who are used to having their way, to adopt a softer stance that is seen as a show of weakness, or even worse, a loss of face, in this hard-nosed business town. The same goes for professionals in the financial sector, another major pillar of the local economy.

Backed by the stock exchange, the stockbroker community staged stiff resistance against a proposal to restructure the listing committee, giving regulators a bigger say in the vetting process. The brokers dug in their heels despite the shortcomings of the existing arrangement being shown up by a spate of scandals that rocked the Growth Enterprise Market.

The matter was settled by a compromise which basically lets the regulator do what it asked for without the need to restructure the stock exchange listing committee. But the high-profile objection from the stock exchange has given the impression it puts the interests of its members, who are also shareholders, ahead of its fiduciary duty to the public in general and investors in particular. As a monopoly, the stock exchange is trusted by the government with the responsibility to preserve the integrity of the market and enhance Hong Kong's reputation as an international financial center.

The government is right to ignore the stock exchange's plea to reduce stamp duty, or tax, on transactions to help boost market turnover. The tax is an important source of revenue to the government and it is debatable whether cutting it can help increase the flow of investment funds into Hong Kong, which would bring real benefit to Hong Kong, rather than simply encouraging stock churning by making it less costly to do so.

There is a much simpler way to boost turnover. All the brokers need to do is to cut their commissions which would have no effect on public coffers. But, of course, they won't do it because it's not good business for them.

The author is a veteran current affairs commentator.

(HK Edition 11/01/2017 page8)

Today's Top News

Editor's picks

Most Viewed

Top
BACK TO THE TOP
English
Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
主站蜘蛛池模板: 亚洲福利视频网 | 99久久婷婷 | 婷婷香蕉| 看全色黄大色黄大片爽一次 | 国内精品视频在线观看 | jizz亚洲大全 | 国产精品影视 | 日本色播 | 性做久久久| 国产精品美女久久久免费 | 奇米第四色在线观看 | 成人免费网视频 | 国产在线综合一区二区三区 | 一级特黄aaa大片大全 | 精品一区二区视频 | 杏美月av | 久久69精品久久久久久国产越南 | 蜜桃视频一区 | 日本道专区无码中文字幕 | 欧美影院 | 亚洲AV久久久久久久无码 | 亚洲欧美日韩另类精品一区二区三区 | 国产一区二区三区在线 | 久久久国产一区二区三区 | 99午夜高清在线视频在观看 | 日本人videos18videosrrty | 91久久久久久久久 | 欧洲毛片 | 欧美亚洲国产第一页草草 | 91精品国产综合久久久久久丝袜 | 久久精品国产一区 | 国产精品国产午夜免费福利看 | 久久国产日韩 | 亚洲一区国产视频 | 欧美亚洲精品一区 | 欧美一级在线观看视频 | 欧美一区二区三区免费观看视频 | 国产成人综合网在线观看 | 亚洲9777精品毛A片久久久 | 欧美日韩精品一区二区在线线 | 色婷婷综合在线 |