日韩精品久久一区二区三区_亚洲色图p_亚洲综合在线最大成人_国产中出在线观看_日韩免费_亚洲综合在线一区

Global EditionASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
Opinion
Home / Opinion / Op-Ed Contributors

Property curbs working to potential

By Yang Zhiyong | Yang Zhiyong | Updated: 2018-01-22 06:53
Share
Share - WeChat
LI MIN / CHINA DAILY

Lanzhou, capital of Northwest China's Gansu province, has reportedly eased the property tightening policy in some of its districts despite local authorities' denial previously, raising public concerns that such measures could be eased nationwide.

If the authorities impose property tightening measures in areas where real estate transactions are not very high, the measures, instead of curbing housing prices, might have a negative impact on even genuine homebuyers as opposed to speculators. The Lanzhou authorities have eased the restrictions on housing purchase policy only in those districts where few people buy houses, not in the areas where the demand for property is high.

The restrictions were imposed to curb soaring housing prices. So they should be lifted after the rise in housing prices is curbed, or declines. In major cities where the housing demand still exceeds supply, the tightening policy continues to be in force.

Ensuring every household's demand for housing is met and people's livelihoods are improved are among the principal goals of the government. And since people's living conditions will improve in accordance with the increase in their incomes, the establishment of a multiple housing supply system would satisfy the demands of people of different income levels.

China is exploring a joint-property rights housing system and a developed rental housing market to meet the housing demand of the households that cannot afford to pay for commercial housing. Since housing is for living in, not speculation, it is not necessary for everyone, especially those with limited purchasing power, to buy commercial housing if joint-property rights housing can meet their residential need.

Given that incomes are increasing at a much slower pace than housing price rise, it doesn't make sense for everyone to purchase commercial housing just to enjoy total property rights. If the rental housing market is developed and enough houses are offered on lease, they can satisfy many people's residential need. As such, joint-property rights housing and rental housing could partly reduce people's demand for commercial housing, and thus help curb the soaring housing prices.

Of course, the real estate market should be regulated. But commercial housing should continue playing a major role in the housing market. Some people argue that China should take a page or two out of Singapore's housing system, which provides affordable housing including joint-property rights housing for a majority of its citizens, to streamline its housing market. But that would mean the government shouldering the responsibility for housing supply.

Instead, what we need is sufficient supply of affordable housing. In market economy, the market should play a crucial role in resource distribution, which means the market should decide housing supply. During special periods, however, the government could play a greater role in housing supply. For instance, when the housing price to income ratio is extremely unreasonable, the government should help meet a part of the housing demand.

A normal market, including the housing market, should use purchase-restriction policies as little as possible, because they restrict the market from playing its due role. After the basic residential demand is met, the market should be allowed to play a leading role in meeting the demands for better, even luxury, housing. And for the mid-to high-end housing demands, purchase restrictions are not only unnecessary; they could also distort the market.
Socialism with Chinese characteristics has stepped into a new era, and the principal contradiction has evolved to be that between "unbalanced and inadequate development and the people's ever-growing needs for a better life". The demand for mid-to high-end housing should be seen as a demand for a better life.

The housing market reform is vital to sustainable and healthy economic growth, but to achieve the essential goal of property tightening measures and to end housing speculation, the authorities should also expand housing supply.

The author is a research fellow at the National Academy of Economic Strategy, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences.

Most Viewed in 24 Hours
Top
BACK TO THE TOP
English
Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
主站蜘蛛池模板: 久久2| 九九热国产视频 | 国产精品久久 | 国产又黄又猛又粗又爽的A片动漫 | 看免费的毛片 | 色综合天天综合网国产成人 | 成人日韩视频 | 香港三级日本三级韩国三级韩 | 日韩在线毛片 | 免费一区二区三区 | 亚洲综合网站 | 偷拍小美女洗澡在线播放 | ww1515hh海外永久360 | 我我色综合 | 91偷拍精品一区二区三区 | 日韩伦理免费在线观看 | 久久久久久国产精品 | 久久这里只有精品免费看青草 | 超级碰碰碰频视频免费观看 | 精品久久成人免费第三区 | 亚洲精品国产成人无码区A片 | 日韩国产在线观看 | 2022国产成人福利精品视频 | 成人黄性视频 | 天堂在线中文字幕 | 在线视频97 | 亚洲免费三区 | 人人看人人看 | 一区二区三区波多野结衣 | 国产中文字幕在线播放 | 手机日韩看片 | 男女超猛烈啪啦啦的免费视频 | 九九色影院| 韩国在线精品福利视频在线观看 | 国产野花视频天堂视频免费 | 色哟哟国产成人精品 | 天天操妹子 | 成人久久| 中文字幕在线免费观看 | 免费久久99精品国产婷婷六月 | 天天操天天干天天爽 |