日韩精品久久一区二区三区_亚洲色图p_亚洲综合在线最大成人_国产中出在线观看_日韩免费_亚洲综合在线一区

Global EditionASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
World
Home / World / World Watch

Travel curbs by nations should be scaled down

By Tom Fowdy | China Daily Global | Updated: 2020-02-10 08:52
Share
Share - WeChat
A passenger in a protective mask uses her phone at Rome's Fiumicino airport, after first cases of novel coronavirus were confirmed in Italy, Jan 31, 2020. [Photo/Agencies]

Although China faces an uphill task in fighting the novel coronavirus, one that will take time and effort, the reaction of some media outlets and countries has been hysterical.

Nations such as the United States and Australia have imposed travel bans on people coming from China, citing public health concerns.

While one should appreciate the efforts of governments to protect their populations and national interests, recent data is beginning to suggest the extent of these efforts in restricting travel to and from China may not be necessary for too long, and may have been an overreaction.

There has been much attention to the fact that patient numbers have continued to grow on a daily basis, especially within Hubei province. Numbers in the rest of China indicate that efforts to contain the outbreak may be starting to pay off.

On Jan 29, the Chinese mainland reported 705 new cases outside Hubei province. On Feb 5, there were 707 new reported cases of the coronavirus outside the province, which represented 19 percent of the total cases.

That percentage has been on a general decline. Decreases were also seen in the number of new cases in Hubei: 2,147 by Feb 8, and 509 new cases in other parts of the mainland.

In that span of a week, the number of new coronavirus cases throughout China did not accelerate on a proportional or real terms basis, illustrating that there is no momentum or multiplier effect. But the number of people leaving hospitals after recovery has been increasing.

Although some have been quick to reject these figures at face value out of political bias, nevertheless there is evidence to suggest this. First of all, despite criticism by the mainstream media, China's measures appear to have been effective in containing the spread of the virus from the Hubei area.

Although the Chinese New Year travel rush was difficult to fully control and did bring cases from place to place, this has settled down and the case numbers reflect it. Second, people throughout the country have been more prepared, therefore taking more contingencies to avoid contracting the coronavirus.

Third, cases in given provinces and cities-as well as those who have been in contact with these patients-are easier to identify, contain and isolate. Thus the response of local authorities has been faster, more preemptive and decisive.

Airports and train stations have been repeatedly sterilized, with infra-scanners being used to detect people's temperatures, while China's artificial intelligence technology and security have been able to more readily assess where infected people have been, thus creating an all-around more prepared-response, which is reflected in the stabilizing number of cases outside of Hubei.

When experts predicted in January that the coronavirus would peak within a couple more weeks, they appear to have been correct. Most of the Western media coverage has not given any credence to China's response but instead sought to present the image of weakness and score ideological points against the country's political system.

The response has been neither weak not ineffective. A China-wide epidemic is being successfully averted and efforts within Hubei itself are now accelerating.

Given these circumstances, countries might want to question the rationale of continuing travel bans or restrictions to and from China. Business as usual outside of Hubei is likely to resume in due course, so therefore it will become increasingly unfair to discriminate against over 1 billion people as a whole.

While it is true that health cooperation requires precautions, it also calls for pragmatism, and the mass scapegoating, racial profiling and stigmatizing of all Chinese people concerning the virus is unacceptable.

Since the situation continues to stabilize, countries should immediately scale down these decisions and at the very least limit them to those who have been to Hubei.

The author is a British political analyst. The views do not necessarily reflect those of China Daily.

Most Viewed in 24 Hours
Top
BACK TO THE TOP
English
Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
主站蜘蛛池模板: 欧美喷潮久久久xxxxx | 香港一级毛片免费看 | 奇米影视777中文久久爱 | 国产精品一区三区 | 欧美视频成人 | 日韩精品 电影一区 亚洲 | 青青免费视频精品一区二区 | 那一个欧美一级毛片 | 久久综合伊人 | 日韩欧美中文 | 欧美三级视频在线播放 | 日本三级一区二区三区 | 性视频亚洲 | 超碰免费在线观看 | 日韩精品一区二区三区中文字幕 | 国产男女交性视频播放 | 久久久123 | 久久精品视频日本 | 欧美久久视频 | 亚洲午夜网未来影院 | 亚洲一卡二卡在线 | 拍拍拍无遮挡高清视频在线网站 | 欧美在线一区二区三区 | 影音先锋资源av | 亚洲看片 | 日本不卡一区在线 | 欧美日韩不卡合集视频 | 久久久久久久亚洲视频 | 亚洲第一在线播放 | 欧美二区在线 | 狠狠综合久久av一区二区小说 | 91水蜜桃 | 国语一级毛片 | 国产99久久久久久免费看 | 91视视频在线观看入口直接观看 | 日韩欧美在线观看视频一区二区 | 久久95 | 91久久精品日日躁夜夜躁国产 | 久久综合丝袜长腿丝袜 | 色综合 成人| 久草在线精品ac |