日韩精品久久一区二区三区_亚洲色图p_亚洲综合在线最大成人_国产中出在线观看_日韩免费_亚洲综合在线一区

Global EditionASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
China
Home / China / HK Macao

Judicial independence 'intact' under new law

By Gu Mengyan in Hong Kong | chinadaily.com.cn | Updated: 2020-07-10 14:26
Share
Share - WeChat

A prominent Hong Kong barrister said criticizing the Hong Kong chief executive's power to select the judges to hear national security cases is "grossly unfair."

Critics say the practice undermines Hong Kong's judicial independence, but Senior Counsel Ronny Tong Ka-wah told China Daily in an interview on Wednesday that "judicial independence" means judges independently deal with cases before them, free of interference from outside agencies.

The National Security Law for Hong Kong, which took effect on June 30, stipulates that the Hong Kong leader shall designate a group of judges to adjudicate on national security cases.

"The chief executive appointing judges has been a part of the city's judicial system for a long time. There's no system in the world where judges can appoint themselves," said Tong, who is also a member of Hong Kong's Executive Council.

Tong said that under the Basic Law, all judges in Hong Kong are appointed by the chief executive upon the recommendation of an independent committee.

Chief Executive Carrie Lam Cheng Yuet-ngor is unlikely to know exactly who is the best suited to hear cases related to national security, so she has to consult with the chief justice, and that's what she did, Tong added.

Judges and legal professionals attend the ceremonial opening of the legal year at City Hall on Jan 13. The chief executive appointing judges is a part of the city's judicial system, Ronny Tong Ka-wah said. [PHOTO PROVIDED TO CHINA DAILY]

Lam earlier designated six magistrates to rule on national security cases after consulting with Chief Justice Geoffrey Ma Tao-li. She said she will have no involvement in the assignment of judges in individual cases.

Tong said the accusation that judicial independence is undermined is an "insult" to every serving judge in the city because it implies quite a few judges are corrupt and receive instructions from the central and the special administrative region governments.

"I got very angry when I heard about it. It's the most unfair and demeaning accusation against our judges. Because that suggestion somehow insinuates that there are good judges and there are bad judges," he said.

The common law expert also noted that the new law establishes "a reasonable compromise" between the protection of individual rights and the protection of State secrets. A case under the law will come before a three-judge panel if it is not heard by a jury.

Tong said most Hong Kong people can be at ease with the law's Article 4, which stipulates that the rights and freedoms guaranteed specifically by two international human rights covenants will be respected and protected. "This represents Beijing's respect for the 'one country, two systems' principle," he said.

Reference to filibustering

Tong, a former Hong Kong legislator, said a few provisions of the new law were motivated by specific events related to last year's social unrest.

"I am relatively happy to see the elements of four offenses clearly spelled out and close to common law language," Tong said, adding that he believes people who say the law is ambiguous may not understand national security laws.

He cited Article 22 in the "Subversion" chapter of the new law, which criminalizes "seriously interfering in, disrupting, or undermining the performance of duties and functions" of the SAR government. Tong said the article is "not vague at all" and could be applicable to some lawmakers who paralyze the Legislative Council with endless filibustering.

LegCo's House Committee, which scrutinizes proposed bills, had failed to elect a chairperson to head its meetings after protracted opposition filibustering that lasted from October to May. Some sessions were marked by scuffles with LegCo security guards and disruptive chants from opposition lawmakers.

"I tend to take the view that if you were to paralyze the working of the legislature for half a year or more, the damage could be quite serious, … which results in no laws being passed within the period and effectively obstructs lots of government work. In this case, I think you come quite close to infringing on the provision," Tong said. It's the responsibility of the courts to measure the seriousness of the damage, he added.

'Double standards'

Tong also addressed the issue of foreign interference, commenting on remarks by US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, who recently called the National Security Law for Hong Kong "an affront to all nations".

Pompeo specifically referred to Article 38, which he said could lead to charges against Americans who are not in Hong Kong or on the Chinese mainland. Article 38 of the National Security Law says foreign nationals outside Hong Kong having committed relevant offenses against Hong Kong are subject to prosecution.

Tong said such views are typical of Western politicians, reflecting the double standards when issues relate to China. In fact, the US has far more extraterritorial laws than other jurisdictions, he said.

US prosecutors have increasingly used extraterritorial jurisdiction to levy charges against foreigners accused of terrorism or organized crime-related offenses, for example, by linking suspects to the influx of drugs to the country or to money laundered through US financial institutions, according to analysis by InSight Crime, a Washington-based nonprofit investigative body.

National security cases always involve "foreign forces" — people not on your territory but trying to harm you, Tong said. "You should not let criminals escape justice simply by leaving or remaining out of certain territory. It's not in the interest of justice," he said.

But Tong acknowledged that the article, like similar stipulations in national security laws of other jurisdictions, will be difficult to implement. "That is something that every national security law would have to face," Tong said.

Top
BACK TO THE TOP
English
Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
 
主站蜘蛛池模板: 亚洲综合精品一区二区三区中文 | 另类五月天 | 久草在线看 | 五月色丁香综缴合 | 精品免费久久久久国产一区 | va在线播放 | 久久一区二区视频 | 亚洲精品www | 欧美性a视频 | 中文字幕av一区二区三区 | 欧美日韩操 | 国产一区二区精品在线 | 亚洲午夜日韩高清一区 | 亚洲av毛片成人精品 | jizzjizz日本人| 日本二本三本二区 | 很黄很暴力深夜爽爽无遮挡 | 欧洲精品在线视频 | 日韩欧美视频一区二区三区 | 69久久夜色精品国产69 | 色婷婷AV99XX | 禁忌二 | 欧美综合在线观看 | 久久久精品99 | 九月婷婷开心九月 | 222奇米影视 | 免费一区 | 国产精品久久久久久无码人妻 | 天天操夜夜 | 亚洲一区二区三区免费看 | 激情五月综合婷婷 | 大香萑75久久精品免费 | 欧美精品中文字幕久久二区 | 毛片一区二区三区四区 | 精品无人乱码一区二区三区 | 亚洲狼人综合干 | www一区二区 | 国外成人直播 | 一区二区三区在线看 | 欧美一级黄视频 | 欧美一二三区 |