日韩精品久久一区二区三区_亚洲色图p_亚洲综合在线最大成人_国产中出在线观看_日韩免费_亚洲综合在线一区

Global EditionASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
Opinion
Home / Opinion / Op-Ed Contributors

World has to learn to live with COVID-19

By Erik Bergl?f | China Daily | Updated: 2020-12-17 07:26
Share
Share - WeChat
SHI YU/CHINA DAILY

Learning to Live with COVID-19

By Erik Bergl?f

LONDON – As COVID-19 infections continue to rise in much of the world, many are clinging to the hope that the arrival of vaccines will soon restore life as we knew it. That is wishful thinking. Even with effective vaccines, COVID-19 will be with us for the foreseeable future – for several years, at least. We are going to have to learn to live with it.

An international panel of scientists and social scientists, convened by the Wellcome Trust, recently constructed four pandemic scenarios. Key variables included what we may learn about the biology of SARS-CoV-2 (the novel coronavirus that causes COVID-19) – such as the pace of mutation and the extent to which an infection elicits antibodies – and how fast we develop and deploy effective vaccines, as well as antivirals and other treatments.

In the study we considered how each of these four scenarios would unfold in five general settings: high-, middle-, and low-income countries, as well as conflict zones, and vulnerable environments like refugee camps and prisons.

Not even in the most optimistic of the four scenarios – characterized by a relatively stable virus, effective vaccines, and improved antiviral therapies – will SARS-CoV-2 be eradicated in all five settings within five years, though community transmission could be eliminated within certain boundaries. And as long as one setting is experiencing a COVID-19 outbreak, all settings are vulnerable, particularly if immunity is short-lived.

As the study shows, eradicating the virus and ending the medical emergency will require not only a vaccine that cuts transmission, but also effective treatments and rapid, accurate tests. Such a medical toolkit would have to be made available and affordable to every country, and be deployed in a manner that leveraged global experience and engaged local communities.

Yet at the moment, only one of the nine leading vaccine candidates stops the spread of the virus; the others aim merely to limit COVID-19’s severity. Moreover, while treatments for moderate and severe cases have significantly improved, they remain unsatisfactory. And testing is flawed, expensive, and subject to supply-chain weaknesses.

With such an imperfect medical toolkit, non-pharmaceutical interventions (such as social distancing and mask wearing) are vital. Fortunately, most countries have recognized the critical importance of early action, imposing strict rules to protect public health fairly rapidly. Many have also provided strong economic support, in order to protect lives and livelihoods amid lockdowns.

But short-term emergency measures like blanket lockdowns are not a sustainable solution. Few countries – especially in the emerging and developing world – can afford to lock down their economies, let alone keep recommended policies in place until an effective vaccine is widely available.

Such measures are merely supposed to slow down transmission and buy time for policymakers and health-care professionals to identify vulnerabilities and, guided by input from the social sciences, devise innovative medium-and long-term strategies suited to local conditions. Unfortunately, this time has not been used particularly wisely so far, with policymakers preferring to imitate one another’s solutions, rather than apply lessons creatively in ways that account for local conditions.

Non-pharmaceutical interventions are not one-size-fits-all. Nor is the process of rolling them back. Epidemiology – complemented by the behavioral sciences – must guide this process.

In practice, this means that advanced economies should ease restrictions only when they have robust systems in place to monitor the evolving public-health situation and to track and trace infected individuals. And they should maintain other transmission-reducing measures, such as face mask requirements, for some time. These measures must be supported by sustained investments in public health and health system capacity.

In emerging economies, full lockdowns will be much more difficult to sustain. The pressure will be on governments to find "intelligent restrictions" based on evidence regarding effectiveness, economic cost, and distributional impact.

The political dimension of the relevant decisions – for example, about whether to open schools or allow large gatherings – must also be taken into account. Leaders must identify the trade-offs of their policy options, recognizing that they may look very different depending on the economic, social, and political context.

How policy choices are made and implemented matters greatly. An effective response must emphasize both individual and collective action, with people taking responsibility for themselves and their communities. Meanwhile, as countries like Norway and Finland have shown, financing temporary "circuit breakers" – as rich countries should all be able to do – can enable progress on reducing community spread.

Political leaders who think they can avoid the pain and discontent that restrictions bring often end up imposing higher costs on their populations. Likewise, those who focus on who is doing better or worse miss the point: everyone is better off if others are doing well. Competition over medical supplies and yet-to-be-produced vaccine doses is counter-productive.

So, while individual countries must adapt solutions to local conditions, the COVID-19 response must ultimately be global. Resources, including vaccines, must be channeled toward the most vulnerable countries and population groups. They must also continue to be allocated to other public-health imperatives, such as the fight against malaria.

Already, the pandemic is fueling inequality both among and within countries. Wealth has amounted to the most potent protection from COVID-19, as it facilitates social distancing and all but guarantees quality health care. But such inequalities weaken the global community’s resilience. The most effective interventions are those that protect the most vulnerable.

Someday, the world may have the full toolkit it needs to eradicate the virus and will have to focus on building the infrastructure and implementing the logistics capacity to deploy it. In the meantime, we should stop placing our hope in a quick return to "normal," and start developing comprehensive, creative and cooperative strategies for living with COVID-19.

Erik Bergl?f is Chief Economist at the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank.

Copyright: Project Syndicate, 2020.
www.project-syndicate.org

Most Viewed in 24 Hours
Top
BACK TO THE TOP
English
Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
主站蜘蛛池模板: 丝袜中文字幕 | 国产精品福利在线观看免费不卡 | 国产欧美日韩亚洲精品区2345 | 国产做国产爱免费视频 | 国产日韩精品久久 | 国产欧美一区二区成人影院 | 午夜一级毛片 | 国产精品热 | 国产日韩一区二区三免费高清 | 欧美在线观看一区 | 九九久久九九久久 | www国产视频 | 狠狠色狠狠色综合日日92 | 欧美在线一区二区三区 | 青娱乐在线免费观看视频 | 国产精品一区av | 欧美成人做性视频在线播放 | 日本精品一二三区 | 日本中文字幕电影 | 二级黄| www.男插女b免费视频 | 亚洲9777精品毛A片久久久 | 99热久久国产综合精品久久国产 | 欧美综合自拍亚洲综合百度 | 搞黄视频在线观看 | 伊人成人在线观看 | 欧美极品在线观看 | 欧美日韩中文在线观看 | 久草视频福利在线观看 | 天天射影院 | 免费看搡女人的视频 | 排球少年第四季 | 激情五月婷婷 | 亚洲国产黄色 | 国产精品片aa在线观看 | 久久人人做 | 青娱乐成人 | 红杏网站永久免费视频入口 | 波多野结衣xfplay在线观看 | 日日爱夜夜操 | 欧美激情刺激爽免费视频观看 |