日韩精品久久一区二区三区_亚洲色图p_亚洲综合在线最大成人_国产中出在线观看_日韩免费_亚洲综合在线一区

Global EditionASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
Opinion
Home / Opinion / Op-Ed Contributors

HK justice system is as sound as ever

By Teresa Cheng | CHINA DAILY | Updated: 2022-04-26 07:34
Share
Share - WeChat
In this file photo dated Aug 5, 2019, a Star Ferry Co vessel sails across Victoria Harbor in front of the Hong Kong island skyline in Hong Kong. [PAUL YEUNG/BLOOMBERG]

Hong Kong's criminal justice system plays a pivotal role in maintaining the social order by ensuring that crimes are effectively detected and investigated, and criminal cases are handled impartially and efficiently while protecting the rights of all parties involved in the process.

Offenses endanger national security

Baseless allegations of "vague charges" of offenses under the National Security Law or other offenses endangering national security under local laws have been made. As pointed out on various occasions, the National Security Law clearly specifies the elements of every offense, including the requisite acts (actus reus) and intent (mens rea).

Under the common law system, the courts may further clarify the elements of an offense in adjudicating cases. For instance, in the Tong Ying-kit case (the first criminal case under the National Security Law), the Court of First Instance has explained the elements of the offenses of incitement to secession and terrorist activities.

Besides, in our criminal justice system, there are avenues for defendants to request further and better particulars of a charge and to complain about defects of a charge. All procedural challenges will be duly considered and adjudicated fairly by the court.

Reporting restrictions in respect of pre-trial proceedings such as bail proceedings and committal proceedings are in place under existing laws (such as the Criminal Procedure Ordinance and the Magistrates Ordinance) to safeguard the fairness and integrity of the eventual trial.

Notwithstanding the reporting restrictions, the relevant proceedings are conducted in open court which members of the public and the media may attend and observe. Defendants may apply to the court for lifting of the reporting restrictions, which will be considered and adjudicated by the court, striking a balance between the defendants' rights and other aspects of the public interest including that of a fair trial.

Bail applications handled fairly

The Court of Final Appeal in the Lai Chee Ying case explains why there are more stringent conditions to the grant of bail in relation to offences endangering national security. The court also took the view that decisions as to whether or not to grant bail are a "juridical exercise carried out by the court as an exercise in judgment or evaluation, not the application of a burden of proof".

There are other common law jurisdictions (such as Canada, South Africa and Australia) where, in respect of certain classes of offences, not only is there no burden of proof on the prosecution to establish grounds for refusing bail, but a burden is placed on the accused to establish why continued detention, rather than release on bail, is not justified.

Contrary to the misinformation that defendants charged with offences endangering national security are all denied bail, it is a matter of fact that a number of defendants, including former legislators, have been released on bail after the courts duly considered the requirements stipulated in the NSL and relevant local laws.

Law enforcement powers legitimate

In discharging duties, law enforcement officials are authorized to exercise certain powers in order to facilitate their investigations. For example, they may apply to the court to obtain production orders or restraint orders under the Organized and Serious Crimes Ordinance for the purpose of investigating an organized crime or preventing dissipation of property by criminal suspects.

Such orders may be made on an ex parte application to a judge in chambers. The ex parte procedure for authorization of investigatory powers is necessary, so as to prevent suspects from destroying evidence, dissipating proceeds of crime or committing other acts to obstruct investigation or pervert the course of justice, and is a common practice in many jurisdictions. There are provisions in the Implementation Rules for Article 43 of the National Security Law to enable the law enforcement authorities to take similar measures when handling cases concerning offenses endangering national security.

Nonetheless, Hong Kong's criminal justice system allows a party that is affected by the court order to apply to have it set aside or varied. The court, having reviewed all evidence, will adjudicate strictly in accordance with the applicable law in an impartial manner.

Trials held in timely manner

Hong Kong's Department of Justice maintains close contact with the law enforcement authorities to ensure that cases are handled expeditiously and effectively. We will proactively explore and follow up on ways to expedite case management, such as seeking consolidation of cases where facts and evidence permit, agreeing on facts and evidence with the defense before trial as far as possible to reduce the number of witnesses to be called and hence the length of trial.

However, the time taken between the institution of prosecution and the trial of each case depends on a multitude of factors, including whether further investigation is required, whether the defendant needs time to obtain legal advice for consideration of his/her plea and to engage in plea negotiation with the prosecution, whether the defense requires certification of translated documents or makes any pre-trial application such as applications for further and better particulars, disclosure, lifting of reporting restrictions, severance of case with multiple defendants, preliminary inquiry and discharge.

It must be stressed here that all applications are handled in accordance with established procedures and due process fully observed. If a defendant, upon legal advice or otherwise, decides to make every possible procedural application irrespective of merits, he/she cannot at the same time conjure any complaint about "delay" which is only the natural consequence of exercising his/her entitlements to the fullest possible extent in a fair criminal justice system.

Duty of counsel very important

Our legal fraternity (including overseas individuals admitted to full practice in Hong Kong) shoulders the primary responsibility for upholding the rule of law, by performing their duty professionally whilst observing the rules of professional conduct.

In carrying out their duty, the personal safety of legal practitioners, like all other individuals, is well protected by law. This fundamental safeguard ensures that they act professionally without fear or favor. A party to a litigation or their legal representatives, in the event of being intimidated, should report to the police with all the available evidence. Needless to say, one must refrain from knowingly deceiving or misleading the court or the police or indeed the public by making false accusations, as such conduct not only harms the reputation of the legal profession the individual belongs to, but may risk breaching the law.

Hong Kong is renowned for having a fair and mature criminal justice system. The principle of prosecutorial independence by the DoJ is constitutionally guaranteed. Not only our prosecutors act independently, I trust all members of the legal fraternity would discharge their duties professionally and honestly without fear or favour, and to uphold the fair and independent criminal justice system.

The author is the secretary for justice of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region.

The views don't necessarily reflect those of China Daily.

If you have a specific expertise, or would like to share your thought about our stories, then send us your writings at [email protected], and [email protected].

Most Viewed in 24 Hours
Top
BACK TO THE TOP
English
Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
主站蜘蛛池模板: 亚洲一区免费在线 | 毛片免费观看完整版 | 亚洲日本在线观看视频 | 夜夜草 | 一区二区免费在线 | 色婷婷网 | 精品美女在线观看视频在线观看 | 本道综合精品 | 日本黄色网战 | 欧美日韩在线第一页 | 亚洲免费视频网站 | 你懂的91| 午夜精品久久久久久久99黑人 | 亚洲视频在线观看免费视频 | 欧美日韩一二三区 | 欧美高清一区二区三区欧美 | 成人精品鲁一区一区二区 | 色婷婷电影 | 亚洲经典激情春色另类 | 欧美一级毛片欧美大尺度一级毛片 | 日本一二三区视频 | 日韩字幕无线乱码 | 亚洲精品欧美视频 | 欧美成人免费高清二区三区 | 日韩专区在线观看 | 国产一区二区三区久久久久久久久 | 亚洲国产成人精彩精品 | 亚洲人成网站看在线播放 | 国产成人亚洲综合a∨婷婷 91亚洲精品一区二区福利 | 成人18免费网站在线观看 | 在线精品亚洲欧美日韩国产 | 摸金校尉之九幽将军 | 国产亚洲精品xxx | 亚洲精品自拍 | 亚洲最大在线视频 | 天天做天天爱天天爽天天综合 | 欧美日韩国产成人在线 | 欧美ol丝袜高跟秘书在线播放 | 欧美精品国产制服第一页 | 久久久www成人免费精品 | 日韩欧美二区 |