Successful China-US Bali summit started making "good fences" for the bilateral relations, but more needs to be done to make "good neighbors".

Editor's note: The world has undergone many changes and shocks in recent years. Enhanced dialogue between scholars from China and overseas is needed to build mutual understanding on many problems the world faces. For this purpose, the China Watch Institute of China Daily and the National Institute for Global Strategy, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, jointly present this special column: The Global Strategy Dialogue, in which experts from China and abroad will offer insightful views, analysis and fresh perspectives on long-term strategic issues of global importance.

In 1914, Robert Frost wrote in his poem Mending Wall that "good fences make good neighbors". There was a ritual in rural New England that every spring, neighbors would meet to rebuild a stone wall between their properties. Frost questions the purpose of borders between people over the course of the poem. And it seems fitting to ask the same questions on the relations between China and the United States, as well as the future of our world.

About 102 years after Frost wrote his poem, US citizens elected Donald Trump to "build walls" and he tried to do that. He pushed very hard to build a physical border wall between the US and Mexico, made of $15 billion worth of materials. When Joe Biden took office as US president, he promptly shut down the project, and now, $265 million leftover wall parts are being donated to state and local governments. By quitting the Paris Agreement, Iran Nuclear Deal and many other international agreements, Trump built another more important wall between US leadership and its obligations. Again, Biden came in and returned to some pre-selected organizations and agreements that he deemed useful to his administration's objectives. But the most consequential wall erected by Trump and yet to be mended by Biden was a "China Wall" that meant to decouple the US from China, allegedly for "US national security".

The ramification of disengaging and fencing-off of China is deeply felt around the world. Trump built the wall with tariffs against Chinese products, but Biden hardened the wall with ideological mortar, multiple Western alliances, tech export controls and much more. If Trump was moving to wall US citizens in and to give them back their sense of self-control, Biden is apparently aggressively constructing an encirclement against China to prevent it from "taking control of the world". So now the bilateral relationship is so walled up that it is not effectively keeping peace but actually leading to misperceptions and miscommunications, just like Ezekiel Rogers remind John Winthrop in his 1640 letter, "that a good fence helps to keep peace between neighbors; but let us take heed that we make not a high stone wall, to keep us from meeting".

That's why the summit between President Xi Jinping and Biden at the Bali G20 Summit on Nov 14 was critically important at this historical juncture: both sides need a good fence ("guardrails" in the US terminology) to clarify boundaries and reduce disputes; and both want the fence to be porous enough so that necessary and normal communications and cooperation are not completely blocked. Luckily, against all odds, the two top leaders did their best to clear the air and far exceeded the "low expectations" of the Western media and pundits prior to the meeting.

First, Biden upgraded the "five noes" to "nine noes" and in particular reiterated that the US would not play the Taiwan card against China or seek economic decoupling from China, and in return, President Xi promised that China "does not seek to change the existing international order or interfere in the internal affairs of the US, and has no intention to challenge or displace the US".

Second, the two leaders tasked their teams to develop principles on managing competition and maintaining open lines of communication. In addition to the resumption of dialogue and cooperation on climate change, public health, agriculture and food security, respective diplomatic and financial teams as well as the China-US joint working group are also beginning to restore regular consultations and coordination, and find solutions to more issues.

Make no mistake, despite the efforts and progress made in the summit, the reality is that the world's most important bilateral relationship is still at a low point, and there won't be fewer quarrels in the process of mending the fences based on mutual agreements. A century before Frost, H. H. Brackenridge wrote that "good fences restrain fence-breaking beasts, and preserve good neighborhoods". Today, the "fence-breaking beasts" are out there, aiming to trample the ground and gain benefits from the conflicts of the neighbors. Racists, protectionists, extreme nationalists, arms dealers, pro-Taiwan lobbyists, anti-communist ideologues, opportunist politicians are all seeking the soft panels of the fences, ready to rip them open and reap a chaotic and degenerative world, or opt for a self-serving reinforced concrete wall to usher in another beggar-thy-neighbor era.

"Before I built a wall I'd ask to know, what I was walling in or walling out, and to whom I was like to give offense. Something there is that doesn't love a wall." Frost narrates in his poem. Having good fences demarcates clear boundaries, helps both sides keep the peace and respect each other's rights and space. But the more revealing question is, what exactly do countries need fences for and ultimately can they gradually reduce the physical fences and still co-exist peacefully? Merely setting up "guardrails" is not enough for the future of China-US relations. Reducing excessive barriers, increasing neighborhood activities, building safety and prosperity for a community with a shared future are the real guarantees for the fences to remain functional. China has made it crystal and abundantly clear that the Chinese modernization is a path of peaceful development and China's doors once opened will never shut. Any misrepresentation of China's strategic intentions should therefore cease and desist. As long as the fences are good enough for trade and investment, cyberspace, space, maritime, and regional stability, the US and more broadly the West, should focus more on healthy competition based on an open market, and global cooperation on those pressing common challenges.

The author is director of Internal Political Studies at the National Institute for Global Strategy. The author contributed this article to China Watch, a think tank powered by China Daily. The views do not necessarily reflect those of China Daily.

Contact the editor at [email protected]