日韩精品久久一区二区三区_亚洲色图p_亚洲综合在线最大成人_国产中出在线观看_日韩免费_亚洲综合在线一区

Global EditionASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
Culture
Home / Culture / Film and TV

Film puts justifiable defense in spotlight

By YANG ZEKUN | China Daily | Updated: 2024-02-16 07:12
Share
Share - WeChat
A poster for the film Article 20 shows actress Zhao Liying portraying a deaf-mute mother. The movie has sparked discussion about the legal concept of justifiable self-defense. CHINA DAILY

Comments from experts, officials and the public about a movie centered on the theme of justifiable defense have called for grasping the essence of the legal concept to prevent unlawful behavior.

The film, Article 20, which is directed by Zhang Yimou, draws its name from Article 20 of the Criminal Law, which focuses on the sometimes contentious legal concept of justifiable self-defense.

Drawing inspiration from real-life cases of justifiable defense, the film has garnered widespread attention and resonated with the public as well as judicial institutions during the Spring Festival holiday. The movie calls for a nuanced interpretation of legal provisions and urges against compromising on unlawful conduct.

According to the Criminal Law, when a person, faced with an unlawful attack, takes action to protect his or her own rights or interests or those of others, and the attacker is thereby harmed, the defender will be considered to have acted in justifiable defense and will not bear criminal liability.

For some time, justifiable defense has been regarded as a "dormant clause", due to challenges in interpretation and the influence of misconceptions, such as "whoever is injured or killed is right".

Many online users have commented that the true meaning of the law should be to increase the liability for wrongdoers, rather than burdening good people.

Recent cases have shown that, for ordinary citizens, justifiable defense is no longer an illusory provision.

Luo Xiang, a renowned professor of criminal law at China University of Political Science and Law, said in a recent comment about the film that the public and judicial officers should avoid taking a "godlike" perspective or adopting a rational but armchair stance. Instead, they should consider the situation in which the defender was involved, empathize with the defender's position, and refrain from making excessive demands on the defender, Luo said.

Ji Bingxue, a prosecutor with the Supreme People's Procuratorate, said in an article published on the SPP's WeChat account that the Criminal Law established the justifiable defense system in 1979 to provide an incentive for citizens to combat crime. Despite improvements in 1997, the system remained dormant for a significant period.

Beyond the statutory provisions, cases involving justifiable defense are often complex, with many lacking adequate evidence, leading to sometimes controversial determinations, Ji said. Additionally, precedents set in previous cases have influenced the application of the justifiable defense concept.

A high-profile case in Kunshan, Jiangsu province, in 2018 served as a wake-up call and caught the attention of judicial authorities regarding such cases. In that case, atraffic dispute led to a knife-wielding motorist confronting another man. The motorist was killed, and police and prosecutors determined that the defender's actions constituted justifiable defense.

Since then, prosecutors in several places across the nation have applied the justifiable defense clause.

There has been public concern in such cases that has primarily focused on the criteria for determining justifiable defense versus excessive defense. The concern over justifiable defense reflects the public's demand for democracy, rule of law, fairness, justice and security, Ji said, adding that the principle of "not compromising with unlawfulness" must guide prosecutors in handling such cases.

"The judiciary serves as society's last bastion of fairness and justice; any faltering risks eroding public trust," he said.

Liu Zhe, a prosecutor from the Beijing People's Procuratorate, said that the existence of "dormant clauses" signifies a lag between legislative and judicial concepts, resulting in misapplications.

"The reliance on outdated judicial concepts inevitably leads to flawed cases. Persisting with such flawed precedents hinders progress, leading to an unjust status quo," Liu said.

Liu emphasized that judicial officers should possess critical thinking skills, dynamically understand the law's essence, and adapt to evolving societal needs to meet public demands for rule of law.

Making decisions departing from traditional precedents requires courage and accountability, Liu said, adding that judicial authorities must consistently support justifiable defense and intervention to empower the public to combat illegal activities.

Most Popular
Top
BACK TO THE TOP
English
Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
主站蜘蛛池模板: 亚洲国产精品成 | 热久久这里只有精品 | 狠狠色噜噜狠狠狠狠2018 | 伊人蕉久影院 | 女人被添全过程A片久久AV | 久久97精品久久久久久久看片 | 日韩经典中文字幕 | 性高湖久久久久久久久aaaaa | 亚洲精品国偷拍自产在线观看 | 国产精品热 | 免费v片 | 色悠久久久久综合欧美99 | 久久精品伊人 | 国产精品久久久久久 | 久久久一区二区三区视频 | 国产精品精品 | 天天摸天天碰天天碰 | 精品国产一区二区三区成人影院 | 91在线网| 久久香蕉国产线熟妇人妻 | www.色黄| 全黄一级裸片视频免费 | 中文字幕国产日韩 | 久久久av| 在线播放一区二区三区 | 五月婷婷在线播放 | 99在线视频观看 | 日日摸夜夜添免费毛片小说 | 日韩18在线观看地址 | 欧美日韩国产在线 | 亚洲视频一区二区 | 国产精品美女久久久久久久网站 | yy4138理论片在线大全 | 欧美在线观看视频 | 久久亚洲国产精品 | 天堂成人| 国产一区二 | 贺鹏个人资料 | 五月色开心婷婷丁香在线 | av天空 | 二区三区在线 |