日韩精品久久一区二区三区_亚洲色图p_亚洲综合在线最大成人_国产中出在线观看_日韩免费_亚洲综合在线一区

USEUROPEAFRICAASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
China
Home / China / Society

Qihoo 360 loses suit against Tencent

Xinhua | Updated: 2013-03-29 02:53

GUANGZHOU - Qihoo 360, a leading Chinese antivirus software developer, lost a lawsuit that it filed against Tencent, China's biggest Internet company, over the latter's abuse of its dominant market position, according to a court ruling issued on Thursday.

Tecent did not create a monopoly and all of Qihoo 360's appeals have been rejected, according to a ruling from the Guangdong Provincial Higher People's Court.

Qihoo 360 was also ordered to pay 790,000 yuan (125,912 US dollars) in legal fees.

Qihoo 360 sued Tencent in October 2011 for hindering market competition and abusing its market position. It also asked for 150 million yuan in compensation from Tencent.

The trial lasted for nearly a year after the Guangdong Provincial Higher People's Court began court proceedings on April 18, 2012. The court had tried to mediate between the two sides but failed.

The evidence provided by Qihoo 360 was not enough to prove that Tencent had a monopoly on certain products, according to the ruling.

Qihoo 360 claimed that QQ, an online chat program developed by Tencent that has more than 780 million active users, has a 76.2-percent market share.

But the court said users have multiple choices for similar instant messaging products.

A survey from the China Internet Network Information Center showed that 63.4 percent of users had used more than two different types of instant messaging software within six months.

Attorneys from both Qihoo 360 and Tencent said they will consult with their companies first before deciding whether to appeal to the Supreme People's Court.

Suing Tencent is not only in the legal interests of Qihoo 360, but can also help maintain sound competition, said Han Han, director of the legal affairs department of Qihoo 360.

Han said Tencent frequently copies mature business modes from other companies and beats its competitors with its massive number of users.

Xu Yan, an executive with Tencent's legal affairs department, disagreed with Han's criticism. "Tencent is a company with sustainable innovation. The introduction of new business modes offers more choices for users and is conducive to forming sound competition in the industry," Xu said.

The legal battle between Qihoo 360 and QQ reflects product homogeneity in the Internet industry, said Liu Xingliang, a renowned Internet expert.

Using legal means to safeguard their own interests is good for online companies, said Shi Jichun, director of the economic law research center at Renmin University of China.

Turning disputes among major market players over to authorities or courts for arbitration will gradually improve market rules and prompt the development of the industry, Shi said.

"The Internet should not be a jungle, where the weak are the prey of the strong," said Zhang Xuejun, chief judge in the suit. "Competition in the Internet industry should be orderly and abide by law."

The two companies have been engaged in a long and drawn-out legal war since 2010.

On September 27, 2010, Qihoo 360 accused Tencent of invading the privacy of its users through the use of QQ Doctor, a security program developed by Tencent for use with its popular QQ instant messaging service. Qihoo 360 claimed that Tencent has used the software to scan and monitor its users' personal information.

Following the complaint, Qihoo 360 released its own security software called "Koukou Guard" on October 29, 2010, claiming it could speed up QQ and offer more privacy to its users. However, Tencent responded by warning its users that the "Koukou Guard" could cause QQ to malfunction.

The dispute escalated when Tencent said on November 3, 2010 that it would shut down the QQ instant messaging service on computers that had security software created by Qihoo 360 installed on them.

Although both companies apologized to Internet users after being ordered by the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology to stop fighting, the war between the two Internet giants had already triggered public outcry.

Editor's picks
Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
 
主站蜘蛛池模板: 免费观看一级毛片 | 中文字幕人成乱码在线观看 | 国产成+人+亚洲+欧美+日韩 | 国产精品91久久久久久 | 欧美精品综合 | 亚洲色图综合图片 | 亚洲人人 | 中文字幕日韩欧美一区二区三区 | 久久精品免费观看 | 成人日韩在线 | 五月婷久久 | 色插综合 | 啪啪小视频网站 | 亚洲一区在线观看视频 | 男女性高爱潮免费网站 | 韩国美女激情视频一区二区 | 婷婷在线观看网站 | 国产成人福利在线视老湿机 | 欧美日韩精品国产一区二区 | 91网页视频入口在线观看 | 国产在线aaa片一区二区99 | 久久青草国产免费观看 | 神马久久久久久久久 | 成人av一区二区三区 | 三片在线观看 | 五月婷综合 | 国内精品久久久久激情影院 | 在线视频h | se就是色94欧美setu | 中文无码日韩欧 | 日韩欧美一级精品久久 | 国产黄在线观看免费观看软件视频 | 国产福利在线观看精品 | 天天看片中文字幕 | 国产a视频 | 伊人久久艹 | 啪啪av| 欧美激情日韩 | 超碰97免费在线 | 国产一级特黄aa大片爽爽 | 天天摸天天操免费播放小视频 |