日韩精品久久一区二区三区_亚洲色图p_亚洲综合在线最大成人_国产中出在线观看_日韩免费_亚洲综合在线一区

In the press

Updated: 2013-09-24 07:07

By Cho Wai(HK Edition)

  Print Mail Large Medium  Small 分享按鈕 0

'Civil nomination' illegal

Civic Party leader Alan Leong Kah-kit, who is a big-shot lawyer by trade, said on a radio program the other day that he "cannot see" how the "civil nomination" format proposed by the Alliance for True Democracy and his party violates the Basic Law: "If you take a look at Article 45 of the Basic Law, it says very clearly that Chief Executive (CE) election candidates shall be nominated by a broadly representative nomination committee through a democratic process."

Leong's words are totally meant to mislead the public, because the Basic Law contains nothing about "civil nomination" and he was attempting to reduce the nomination committee to a rubber stamp. That is why it goes against the Basic Law and relevant decisions of the National People's Congress Standing Committee.

Zhang Xiaoming, director of the Liaison Office of the Central People's Government in the Hong Kong SAR, pointed out in a written reply to Leong earlier this month that "civil nomination" totally ignores relevant provisions of the Basic Law, adding that "legal professionals should know better than others the importance of the rule of law and never cross the line." It appears Leong has abandoned the basic code of conduct of legal professionals in order to satisfy his own political needs.

Article 45 of the Basic Law stipulates that the ultimate goal of Hong Kong's democratic development is the election of the CE and members of the Legislative Council (LegCo) by universal suffrage; and CE election candidates will be nominated by "a broadly representative nomination committee", meaning it will be an institutional nomination process instead of an individual one.

"Civil nomination", on the other hand, relies on individual voters and anyone who has collected a certain number or more of voter signatures can stand for CE election. If "civil nomination" is adopted the term "broadly representative" will be irrelevant, as the nomination committee is redundant. In that case shouldn't the Basic Law be rewritten with "civil nomination" replacing references to the nomination committee?

The author is a current affairs commentator. This is an excerpted translation of his column published in Wen Wei Po on Sept 23.

In the press

(HK Edition 09/24/2013 page1)

主站蜘蛛池模板: 中文字幕免费在线观看视频 | 天天碰天天摸天天操 | 欧美日本日韩aⅴ在线视频 日韩福利视频导航 | 欧美一区二区三区在线观看视频 | 黄色a视频 | 亚洲国产午夜电影在线入口 | 九九99九九精彩 | 一区在线免费观看 | 日韩电影中文字幕 | 日韩欧美日本 | 激情五月色播五月 | 91免费国产 | 美女久久久久久久久久久 | 中文字幕一区二区三区四区 | www.亚洲在线 | 91精品国产日韩91久久久久久 | 性一级录像片片视频免费看 | 亚洲人和日本人jizz | 777色狠狠一区二区三区香蕉 | 青青草国产精品欧美成人 | 天天插视频| 99亚洲视频| 国产精品三级在线 | 中文字幕不卡在线观看 | 国产亚洲美女精品久久久久 | 久久久久久av | av一二三区 | 欧美综合自拍亚洲综合百度 | 国产女主播喷出白浆视频 | 天天色天天射天天操 | 一级一级 a爱片免费视频 | 国产日韩欧美自拍 | 日夜啪啪 | 欧美成人精品一区二区男人看 | 天天爱夜夜操 | 女人被狂躁视频免费网站 | 日韩美在线 | 国产九九精品视频 | 黄片一级毛片 | 综合九九| 国产亚洲综合一区在线 |