日韩精品久久一区二区三区_亚洲色图p_亚洲综合在线最大成人_国产中出在线观看_日韩免费_亚洲综合在线一区

USEUROPEAFRICAASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
China
Home / China / View

Climate change responsibilities

By Yang Fuqiang | China Daily | Updated: 2012-12-05 08:18

Developed countries should keep their promises to provide developing nations with funds and clean technology

There are disagreements about how developed nations should offer funding assistance to help developing nations combat the effects of climate change and reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Whether substantial progress is made over the funding will help determine if the ongoing United Nations climate conference in Doha, Qatar, is a success or not.

The basis for such financial assistance is developed countries have emitted large volumes of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases since the start of the Industrial Revolution, gases that are viewed as a main cause of climate change and which are now at an impassable limit.

Despite their unshirkable political and moral responsibilities to offer considerable funds to the less-developed nations, which are the main victims of global greenhouse gas emissions, developed countries hold a bigoted and prejudiced attitude toward providing funds to developing countries, citing the possibility of developing nations using climate change as an excuse to acquire funding assistance for their economic development or other purposes.

Such an argument is groundless. Global losses caused by natural disasters and a degrading environment and ecosystem due to greenhouse gas emissions are enormous and the historical emitters should provide some compensation for the effects of their historical emissions. According to estimates by the World Bank and the United Nations Environment Program, developed countries should provide hundreds of billions of dollars a year to developing countries to compensate for the losses they have caused developing countries.

Actions taken by developing countries to tackle climate change - from forest protection and their efforts to adapt to a degrading environment and ease the impact of greenhouse gas emissions, to their efforts to acquire clean technology and train technological personnel - all need funding support from developed countries.

And so far, no developed nation has transferred technology to developing nations. But the proposal by developing nations that they can use the funds donated by developed countries to purchase some necessary technological patents from the private sector has opened a new approach for the realization of such technological transfers.

Although developed countries are reluctant to make any funding-assistance promises to developing nations, as indicated by the fruitless debates at the ongoing Doha conference, developing nations have put forward a few options: The first is the establishment of Fast Start finance for 2013 to 2015, as suggested by some Central African and island nations, a program similar to the $30 billion Fast Start finance for 2010 to 2012. The new finance should be $20 billion each year from 2013 to 2015, according to proponents. The second option, some developing nations suggest, is the establishment of a long-term funding mechanism, which would total $100 billion by 2020 - a commitment already made by developed countries at several climate conferences.

With the expiration of the first Fast Start finance at the end of this year, a majority of developed countries claim they have fulfilled their funding promises, some even claim their donations have exceeded their proposed commitment. However, the assistance has been much lower than promised. Some developing nations have also criticized the provision of the Fast Start finance as "fragmented across many channels", which, they said, has made its access and accountability extremely difficult to monitor. Many people even suspect that there was a lot of repackaging of old financial support in the Fast Start program, which violates the rules set up in Copenhagen that all the finance should be new and additional. According to a recent report by Oxfam, a British aid and development charity, only 33 percent of the money pledged for Fast Start is "new", and no more than 24 percent is "additional". Part of the money has come from the private sector rather than public finances, another violation of the Copenhagen spirit, the report said.

Thus, an objective and scientific assessment should be conducted to monitor the first Fast Start finance and its effects. Those countries that failed to fulfill their promises or misused donations should be held accountable. Such evaluation should also be applied to the different stages of long-term funding assistance.

Despite the establishment of the Green Climate Fund, which was established to provide support to developing countries to limit or reduce their greenhouse gas emissions and to adapt to the impacts of climate change, no donations have so far been made. Concrete quotas should be stipulated for developed countries to contribute to the fund.

There also exist disagreements between developed and developing nations on the management of the green program, with the developing nations saying it should be put under the administration of the UN climate change conference to increase its transparency. Developed countries argue that the World Bank or other international institutions should administer the fund and the fund's board of directors should lay down its management specifics.

The greenhouse gas emissions by developing nations are expected to rapidly rise with their economic development. That will possibly be used as an excuse by developed countries to reduce their funding assistance to developing nations. Thus, developing nations should strengthen South-South cooperation, technologically or in funding, and explore the establishment of a climate fund to enhance their unity and mutual support in tackling climate change.

The author is a senior energy, environment and climate consultant to the National Resources Defense Council.

Editor's picks
Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
主站蜘蛛池模板: 天天操2018| 亚洲午夜成激人情在线影院 | 欧美日韩一区二区三区在线观看 | 成人黄色在线视频 | 国产精品极品美女自在线看免费一区二区 | 免费观看视频91 | 中文字幕av一区二区 | 婷婷国产成人久久精品激情 | 国产日韩久久久精品影院首页 | 日韩免费视频一区二区 | 久久婷婷是五月综合色狠狠 | 成人久久久久爱 | 日韩欧美动作影片 | 国产成人一级片 | 欧美性黑人极品 hd 无码一区二区三区曰本A片 | 国产高清美女一级毛片 | 国产日韩在线观看一区 | 成人淫片免费视频95视频 | 亚洲天堂免费视频 | 成人av一区二区三区 | 99久久久无码国产精品 | 四虎1515hhhcom| 日韩伦理免费在线观看 | 国产亚洲精品不卡在线 | 国产精品夜夜春夜夜爽久久 | 91麻豆精品一二三区在线 | 性aaa| 欧美日韩亚洲国内综合网俺 | 色哟哟国产成人精品 | 免费在线亚洲视频 | 国产精品久久福利新婚之夜 | 又大又粗进出白浆直流动态图 | 日本黄页网址 | 成人欧美一区二区三区视频xxx | 奇米影视在线 | 国产成人久久精品二区三区牛 | 美女在线视频一区二区 | www.久久久| 毛片a级毛片免费播放100 | 少年班江依琳 | 国产精选经典三级小泽玛利亚 |