日韩精品久久一区二区三区_亚洲色图p_亚洲综合在线最大成人_国产中出在线观看_日韩免费_亚洲综合在线一区

   
 
Apple gains ground in patent war against HTC
(China Daily)
Updated: 2011-12-21

 Apple gains ground in patent war against HTC

Customers try out HTC Corp products in Taipei. Apple Inc still has one other patent case against HTC. Maurice Tsai / Bloomberg

WASHINGTON - Apple Inc won a patent-infringement ruling that bans some HTC Corp smartphones from the United States starting next year, bolstering efforts to prove that devices running Google Inc's Android operating system copy the Apple iPhone.

The US International Trade Commission, in a review of a judge's findings in July, said on Monday that HTC is violating one Apple patent related to data-detection technology and issued a limited import exclusion order that takes effect April 19.

"HTC will completely remove it from all of our phones soon," Grace Lei, general counsel for HTC, said in an e-mail.

The six-member commission determined that three other patents in the case weren't infringed.

While less than what Apple sought, the ruling gives the company its first victory in patent cases designed to slow the growth of Android, which Steve Jobs claimed "ripped off the iPhone". Apple has one other case against HTC, as well as complaints against Samsung Electronics Co and Motorola Mobility Holdings Inc, and is involved in more than a dozen other cases before the trade commission.

"The battle between Apple and Android is going to continue," said Peter Toren, a patent lawyer with Shulman Rogers. "I'm not sure this decision - the way it is - is enough to push the parties to settlement. Apple doesn't have the leverage of a total exclusionary order."

The list of affected products and a full reason for the commission's decision, which is subject to appeal and a presidential review, wasn't immediately made public. Apple's original complaint named HTC's Nexus One, Touch Pro, Diamond, Tilt II, Dream, myTouch, Hero and Droid Eris.

Kristin Huguet, a spokeswoman for Apple, declined to discuss the possibility of a settlement. She repeated the company's position that "competition is healthy, but competitors should create their own original technology".

Representatives from Google had no immediate comment.

The ruling is the first definitive decision in the dozens of patent cases that began to proliferate in 2010 as smartphone makers battle over a market that Strategy Analytics Inc said increased 44 percent last quarter from a year earlier to 117 million phones worldwide.

HTC, the second-largest maker of Android phones, used its partnership with Google to help transform itself from a contract manufacturer founded in 1997 to the biggest US smartphone seller in the third quarter.

HTC generated about $5 billion in US sales last year, according to a separate patent complaint it filed at the trade agency against Apple. That's more than half of HTC's $9 billion in global sales last year.

The commission's order applies to new phone imports and doesn't force HTC to pull existing devices off US store shelves.

HTC phones accounted for 24 percent of the US smartphone market in the third quarter based on shipments, the research company Canalys reported on Oct 31.

Samsung held 21 percent of the market and Apple 20 percent. The market is volatile, and the Apple iPhone 4s that went on sale in October and Samsung's newest Galaxy phone are likely to change the rankings for the fourth quarter.

Apple contended in its complaint that the HTC phones infringed four patents. Administrative Law Judge Carl Charneski in July sided with Apple for two of the patents: the data-detection one and the other covering the transmission of multiple types of data. The commission overturned the judge's findings on that patent and affirmed his determination that the remaining two patents weren't infringed.

Bloomberg News

(China Daily 12/21/2011 page16)



Preventing a patent authorization

Are we able to stop our rivals from obtaining authorization of a patent application that we regard as having substantial defects during the substantive examination, given the fact that the rival companies hane already published their patent applications?

The protection of design on printed flat works

How can a party use hedging to prepare for the risk of infringing?

Can an expired patent be applied again?

What is the difference between a non-compete obligation and trade secret confidentiality obligation?

主站蜘蛛池模板: 国产精品美女久久久久久久久久久 | 欧美精品导航 | 午夜在线观看免费视频 | www.国产 | 国产成人一级片 | 日韩天天操 | 一区二区日韩 | 狠狠色丁香婷婷综合久久片 | 久久99精品久久久久久国产越南 | 一级福利 | 欧美午夜激情影院 | 久久精品探花 | 久草在线视频福利 | 日韩视频在线观看免费视频 | 色艹| 国产精品久久久久久久久免费相片 | 精品96久久久久久中文字幕无 | 欧美综合亚洲 | av超碰| 嘿咻嘿咻免费区在线观看吃奶 | 久久久久久免费一区二区三区 | 成人伊人 | 国产高清美女一级a毛片久久 | 国产老女人精品毛片久久 | 亚洲综合五月天激动情网 | 久久国产乱子伦精品免 | 亚洲高清视频在线 | 日本高清视频www夜色资源网 | 欧美性综合 | 久久综合日韩亚洲精品色 | 亚洲一区在线观看视频 | 久久99国产一区二区三区 | 婷婷色综合 | 久久久免费视频观看 | 一级毛片在线看在线播放 | 片在线观看免费观看视频 | 国产xxxx搡xxxxx搡麻豆 | 青青久草在线 | 亚洲精品a级 | 黑人精品欧美一区二区蜜桃 | 欧美激情精品久久久久久久 |