日韩精品久久一区二区三区_亚洲色图p_亚洲综合在线最大成人_国产中出在线观看_日韩免费_亚洲综合在线一区

USEUROPEAFRICAASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
China
Home / China / View

The big scoop on print media tragedy

By Tom plate | China Daily | Updated: 2013-08-14 07:55

The digital revolution roiling all media in societies plugged into the Internet is having a profound effect on journalism across the world. Paper has become the stone tablet of our time, not quite as hefty in weight but in other respects as cumbersome.

The effect of the digital revolution, however, is not universally even. Economies that are still rapidly developing will feel it less than those that are more mature. China seems to be launching newspapers or magazines almost every other week. In the US, in contrast, they seem to be folding or changing ownership almost constantly, usually in downward spirals.

Perhaps the digital revolution is hitting hardest in the US, where the media are accorded a special role. The towering importance of the news media in the US political system is well known but not often emulated around the world. It's the rare government that would welcome a media powerful enough to topple it, as The Washington Post helped to do to former US president Richard Nixon in August 1974.

And so it was not surprising that the sale of the financially troubled Post - the leading newspaper of Washington D.C. and one of the leading newspapers of the world - to Amazon.com billionaire Jeff Bezos for $250 million hit many of the Americans hard in the stomach. It is almost as if the Vatican had decided to sell itself to an international resorts corporation for condo redevelopment. The comparison is only somewhat of an exaggeration.

While the US' greatest newspaper, The New York Times, is still controlled by the Sulzberger family, which deserves the nation's gratitude for keeping it great, the country's most politically pugnacious paper has been The Washington Post, whose legendary editor - now "vice-president at large" - is 91 but, in a manner of speaking, still kicking.

My respect for the newspaper medium goes deep - to the way the entire daily package is put together in order to offer us a large picture of the world, and to the overworked and underpaid editors who work diligently to maintain professional quality control. Even a mediocre newspaper is no blog.

But will the digital media overtake the print media one day? In the US, that is already happening. Twenty years ago the paid circulation of the Los Angeles Times was roughly twice what it is today. All over the country, newspapers are struggling to remain stable and profitable. Magazines are generally sagging, too: Worthy Newsweek is out of the print business already, and Time, while struggling valiantly, is also in trouble.

Only high-end and specialty publications will be successful in charging for content online. Some might imaginatively consider expanding their product line; surely Bezos will try a different, more expansive approach with The Washington Post.

The transition to digital is invariably difficult. The New York Times is having success just offering a digital version of itself, but then again that is some self! Its management did not, after all, decimate its foreign-correspondent network and scissor out strings of editorial pearls, as, for example, has the fast-sinking Los Angeles Times. What genius that took.

The best strategy for a widely read publication, whose loyalty is based on the quality of the product, is to not compromise on the quality with serial staff reductions and editorial downgrades. A good example of the proper strategy is that of NewsCorp with The Wall Street Journal, a newspaper that is in better shape now than when the Bancroft family sold it to Rupert Murdoch in 2007. Cutting back on a publication's capacity for greatness is simply a slow march to the grave. Online alone, The Wall Street Journal has nearly 900,00 paid digital subscriptions. Why? Its editors make us think we cannot afford to miss it.

My trip to China last month was an eye-opener. Editors and journalists in China's print media are as scared to death by the digital revolution as any of us here in the US. But there is a difference. For starters, China's economy, though slowing, continues to expand, with an increasingly assertive and moneyed middle class demanding choice and variety (and a measure of relevance) in its journalism.

The other good thing is that journalism as a profession - as a worthy activity, something that one might do for a lifetime - is a plausible option for a young university graduate. Indeed, China's journalism schools are flooded with applications, and are trying to accept as many students as they can. How can this be bad?

The author is Los Angeles-based Loyola Marymount University's distinguished scholar of Asian and Pacific Studies.

Editor's picks
Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
主站蜘蛛池模板: 日本高免费观看在线播放 | 国产精品久久久久久亚洲调教 | 轻轻啪在线视频播放 | 欧美高清不卡午夜精品免费视频 | 日韩 欧美 亚洲国产 | 中文字幕日本视频 | 韩国女主播青草在线观看 | 亚洲高清一区二区三区 | 国产综合精品 | 高清男女性高爱潮免费 | 国产精品久久久久亚洲 | 偷拍自拍成人 | 成人毛片100免费观看 | 欧美精品aaa久久久影院 | 极品白嫩无套视频在线播放张悠雨 | 99久久99久久精品免费看蜜桃 | 精品尤物 | 日本中文字幕不卡 | 欧美18videos性处按摩 | 激情五月婷婷综合网 | 国产成人一区二区三区电影 | 久久影院在线观看 | 开心综合 | 久久精品 | 日韩精品小视频 | 久久综合九色综合国产 | 国产精品成人在线播放 | 狠狠色噜噜狠狠狠狠米奇777 | 国产日韩欧美在线观看不卡 | 国产精品亲子伦av一区二区三区 | 久久久精品欧美 | 精品网站999www | 天天摸日日碰天天看免费 | 日韩高清一区 | 欧美一区二区在线免费观看 | 欧美一区二区在线播放 | 亚洲在线播放视频 | 国产精品美女 | 亚洲成av人片在线观看 | 国产视频大全 | 亚洲日本久久久午夜精品 |