A high-level official of the National Bureau of Statistics (NBS) explained
why the robust growth of China's economy has not brought along a corresponding
growth in employment during an interview with the Xinhua News Agency on Monday.
Although the unidentified official's technical jargon rendered his
interpretation difficult to comprehend, the explanation itself indicates that
the authorities have begun to realize the seriousness of the problem.
Theoretically, economic growth will yield more job opportunities. China has
achieved an eye-catching rate of growth, but people do not perceive an
improvement in their employment situations: half of new university graduates
cannot find a job; rural migrant workers roam city streets looking for whatever
can earn them bread; and State-owned enterprises lay off more and more workers.
It should be noted that the employment rate has kept rising as the national
economy developed over the 28 years since China commenced its economic reform
drive. While the gross domestic product (GDP) soared from 364.5 billion yuan
(US$45.6 billion) in 1978 to 18.23 trillion yuan (US$2.28 trillion) in 2005, the
number of employed rose from 401 million to 758 million.
Then why do people still feel that jobs are hard to come by?
One simple reason is that China's total population has risen too quickly, and
every year a large army of fresh labourers is plunged into the market. This
argument is right.
Another phenomenon, however, merits our attention: The speed of job increase
is obviously incongruous with the growth rate of GDP.
In the past few years, China's GDP has been growing at a rate of between 9
per cent and 10 per cent, but the rate of employment growth has remained around
4 per cent. Longer-term statistics also indicate the same trend (although the
method of statistics calculation may have been inconsistent). In the 1980s, a
1-percentage-point increase in GDP would generate 0.453 per cent more jobs. The
jobs figure plunged to 0.11 per cent in the 1990s, and further dropped to 0.098
per cent in the first four years of the new century.
Such a dichotomy in growth rates between GDP and employment is strikingly
abnormal. Something must have gone wrong in our economic development.
The NBS official proffered various explanations, such as the "dual-element
structure of urban and rural economies," the "upgrading of the economic
structure," the "declining of the primary industry," the "contradiction between
labour quality and market needs," et cetera, et cetera.
However, he seems to have neglected a very important reason, which is
conspicuous and easy to settle, if the competent authorities are determined
enough.
The brisk development of China's manufacturing and service industries in the
past decade or so was based on "high efficiency" in the use of labour. In these
industries, most "low efficiency" State-owned enterprises have been shut down or
transformed into private ones, leaving many workers "laid off." Private and
foreign-invested enterprises' exertion of the labour force has almost gone to
extremes in order to cut the cost to the minimum possible level.
"Extra work hours" are common in almost all these enterprises with little or
even no pay.
In the Pearl River Delta region in South China's Guangdong Province, normal
work shifts without "extra hours" have become "abnormal." Employees, mostly
migrants from other provinces, in the toy, shoe, garment or electronics plants
usually have to work extra hours "voluntarily" because the work quota is too
heavy and they don't want to lose their jobs. There have been several reports of
employees dying because of overwork.
White-collar workers are faced with the same situation. My niece works at a
company in the Jianguomen area of Beijing, an area well known for its
concentration of foreign companies. She never comes home at the normal hour for
supper. I asked her if her boss wanted her to work extra hours. "The boss never
requested so. I have to do it, otherwise I will not finish the work. Everybody
in the office does the same," she replied. Other friends of mine who work in
these companies told the same story.
Raising work efficiency is one of the goals of our reform and is absolutely
justifiable. But what the bosses in these plants and companies are doing has
gone beyond the legal, and ethical, boundary.
In a certain sense, the growth of GDP in many localities is achieved at the
cost of employment and workers' health and rights.
The contradiction between efficiency and employment should be properly
handled. Workers themselves cannot help it. It is the State's responsibility to
make a law guaranteeing a reasonable relationship between efficiency and
employment.
Only in this way can the employment rate rise in synchronization with the
growth of GDP.
Email: [email protected]
(China Daily 08/30/2006 page4)
