日韩精品久久一区二区三区_亚洲色图p_亚洲综合在线最大成人_国产中出在线观看_日韩免费_亚洲综合在线一区

US EUROPE AFRICA ASIA 中文
Opinion / Editorials

Defend fairness of exams

(China Daily) Updated: 2014-06-09 08:10

Different people have different expectations of the annual national college entrance exams. But for students who sit the exams, high scores are solely what they expect or hope for. The fact that exam results will make a difference to their future, unless there is a reform to subvert its basic model, points to the stupidity of the argument that the current exams are the culprit for the country's lack of first-class scientists and thinkers.

Finger-pointing at the exam model has resulted in high-pitched demand for reform of the model, but it seems that very few know what kind of changes should be made to the current system, in which candidates' exam results solely decide which universities they will enter.

The autonomy some universities have been granted to enroll a certain percentage of students on their own, for the purpose of paving the way for a multiple means of college enrollment, has actually provided opportunities for rent seeking on the part of both the institutions of higher learning and those who can afford to buy their children's way into prestigious universities.

Whether such autonomy should be taken away from the hands of universities remains a question, but what sparks controversy is the practice by 16 provinces and municipalities including Beijing to give extra scores to exam candidates who are appraised as models of ethical behavior and moral integrity.

The problem is who has the power to decide which student is such a model and what are the criteria. If such a practice is just a way for some people with wealth or other resources to lubricate their children's way into prestigious universities, such a practice will become morally corrupt in the name of giving credit to students that are role models.

It is indeed necessary to make changes to the current exam model so that multiple criteria apply in the enrollment of students. Yet, such changes should never open the door to corruption or erode the fairness of the exams.

If there cannot be enough transparency and supervision over a university's autonomy to enroll students on their own or other ways of appraising the qualities of candidates, the national college entrance exam model may have to remain as it is until the conditions become ripe for reform.

That many Chinese graduates have developed well in the Western countries points to the fact that this exam model is not that bad and does help foster a lot of candidates with excellent talents.

Most Viewed Today's Top News
...
主站蜘蛛池模板: 欧美日韩一区二区三 | 五月天婷婷精品视频 | 亚洲毛片在线观看 | 中文在线一区二区 | 欧美日韩亚洲一区二区三区在线观看 | 久久久精| 一区二区三区高清在线 | 少年班江依琳 | 欧美日韩一区二区中文字幕 | xxxx日本在线 | 天天看天天干 | 日本高清免费h色视频在线观看 | 亚洲娇小性色xxxx | 成人精品免费视频 | 国产大片在线观看 | 99热综合| 日日摸夜夜添免费毛片小说 | 午夜a狂野欧美一区二区 | 欧美性黑人极品 hd 无码一区二区三区曰本A片 | 一级片成人 | 大香久久 | 久草网在线观看 | 精品在线 | 欧美视频一区 | 精品成人网 | 视频一区二区在线观看 | www亚洲一区| 国产日韩一区在线精品欧美玲 | 国产精品久久人妻无码网站蜜臀 | 成人在线看片 | 亚洲国产精品热久久 | 麻豆国产精品va在线观看不卡 | 91麻豆精东果冻天美传媒老狼 | 国产美女一区二区三区 | 成人午夜毛片在线看 | 一区二区三区欧美在线观看 | 亚洲视频1 | www.福利视频| a视频在线免费观看 | 青草青草久热精品视频在线网站 | 欧美日韩高清不卡免费观看 |