日韩精品久久一区二区三区_亚洲色图p_亚洲综合在线最大成人_国产中出在线观看_日韩免费_亚洲综合在线一区

US EUROPE AFRICA ASIA 中文
Opinion / Opinion Line

Demolition of university building causes dilemma for local officials

(China Daily) Updated: 2016-09-13 07:53

Demolition of university building causes dilemma for local officials

People flock to the cherry blossom garden in Wuhan University on the first day it began selling tickets in Wuhan city, capital of Central China's Hubei province, March 21, 2014. [Photo/icpress.cn]

THE MAIN TEACHING BUILDING OF Wuhan University in Central China's Hubei province was demolished with explosives on Friday. Media reports quoted local officials as saying they demolished the building as it spoiled the scenic surroundings of nearby East Lake. Southern Metropolis Daily commented:

The building, designed by architect He Jingtang, was built in 1997 at the cost of 100 million yuan ($14.9 million) and put into use in 2000. It won several national architecture awards, including the top award for architecture, the Luban Award.

Yet the building was demolished at the cost of 13 million yuan. That's a huge waste of taxpayers' money, because Wuhan University is a public university, funded by the State.

Moreover, the incident is a legal matter. Let's have a look at the nation's Circular Economy Promotion Law, which requires urban governments and the owners of buildings to take measures to maintain them and lengthen their service life. The law also forbids local governments to demolish buildings within their service lives unless it is in the public's interest.

Obviously, demolishing the university building breaks the law. In order to defend themselves, the officials offered the excuse that the building was so high that it exceeded the height limits for buildings around the East Lake. They even said that the building has "ruined the scenery of East Lake".

That's a rather weak excuse and a ridiculous defense. As early as the 1980s, East Lake was listed in the national plan for ecological tourism, and the building was constructed later than that. If the building went against that plan, why did the officials not intervene when they started building it? Why were they silent in 1996 and then have the building demolished 20 years later?

Officials in Wuhan now face a dilemma. If they insist the demolished building had problems, the officials who approved its construction in 1996 should be held answerable. If the building did not break any planning restrictions and there was no justification for the demolition, those who decided to demolish it should pay for their deeds. Something illegal has happened and taxpayers' money has been wasted, and we hope to make clear who is responsible.

Most Viewed Today's Top News
...
主站蜘蛛池模板: 孕妇体内谢精满日本电影 | 亚洲九九夜夜 | 国产综合精品 | 日韩有码一区 | 国产高清www免费视频 | 影音先锋亚洲资源 | 三级黄色免费观看 | 国产馆精品推荐在线观看 | 欧美色欧美色 | 正在播放国产无套露脸 | 超碰综合 | 人人射人人草 | 国产1区在线观看 | 精品福利视频在线观看视频 | 国产成人综合日韩精品婷婷九月 | www欧美| 亚洲精品视 | 波多野结衣久久一区二区 | 婷婷亚洲五月琪琪综合 | 成人在线视频黄色 | 亚洲精品一区中文字幕乱码 | 乱子伦xxxxvideos | 亚洲欧美日韩国产精品26u | 四虎影视免费观看免费观看 | 成人理论 | 国产在线永久免费 | 精品伊人久久久99热这里只 | 久久99精品久久久久久臀蜜桃 | 麻豆av免费观看 | 久久久久久久av | 黄视频网站在线看 | 日韩欧美三级在线 | 2016天天干| 九九精品九九 | 亚洲电影在线观看 | 一级特黄特黄毛片欧美的 | 亚洲国产精品久久婷婷 | 欧美不卡一区二区三区在线观看 | 欧美日韩国产一区二区三区不卡 | 香蕉国产人午夜视频在线 | 日韩欧美一区二区三区在线视频 |