日韩精品久久一区二区三区_亚洲色图p_亚洲综合在线最大成人_国产中出在线观看_日韩免费_亚洲综合在线一区

Global EditionASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
Opinion
Home / Opinion / Op-Ed Contributors

The world needs science, and science needs women

By Alexandra Palt | China Daily | Updated: 2018-03-27 10:15
Share
Share - WeChat
UNESCO Director-General Audrey Azoulay (tenth from right) and Chairman and CEO of L'Oréal and Chairman of the L'Oréal Foundation Jean Paul Agon (eighth from right) present the 20th L'Oréal-UNESCO For Women in Science awards and fellowships to outstanding women scientists during a ceremony held on March 22 at UNESCO headquarters in Paris, France. [Photo provided to China Daily]

While these last few months will undoubtedly remain in our collective history as those of the global liberation of women's voices in the world of cinema, in politics, the non-for profit sector and even business, there is a sector where women's voices have remained astonishingly silent: science. This is the case despite the fact that science faces the kind of disparity about which we should all, as a society, be concerned.

If the proportion of women engaged in scientific careers has grown, albeit too slowly, many of them still come up against obstacles in accomplishing long and flourishing careers, achieving positions of responsibility or gaining access to funding. As a result, in European Union for example, only 11 percent of senior roles in academic institutions are currently held by women. Less than 30 percent of researchers are women and only 3 percent of Nobel Prizes for Science have ever been awarded to women scientists.

How can we explain that after years of fighting for gender equality, the under representation of women in science should still be so glaring, and above all, what are the consequences for our world?

They are numerous and we must collectively seek to understand them, as much for the society that we want to build, as for the advance of scientific progress and knowledge, which are critical to solving the great challenges of our time.

The absence of women has had and will have major consequences. Let's take two fields of scientific application.

Firstly, in the area of health, there are multiple examples. Have we truly realized, for example, that for a long time, the idea that cardiovascular illnesses were a masculine issue prevailed? The principle clinical trials on reducing risk factors were led exclusively by men. Even in 1999, it was observed that doctors undertook half as many examinations of cardiac illnesses among women than among men. The landmark study on aspirin as a means of reducing the risk of cardiac arrest encompassed more than 22,000 men and not a single woman. Very sadly, this led to inappropriate treatment for women.

The second field, which is just as concerning, is men's control of the digital revolution, and the subsequent implications for women. In the early stages of voice recognition, there was no doubt over male bias in software development. Consequently, not all that long ago, the number of transcription errors when women used voice recognition applications was considerably higher than among their male counterparts, as the applications had been designed from the outset by men. In the domain of artificial intelligence, which will have a definitive effect on our future, studies have also shown that image banks associate women with domestic tasks and men with sport, and that image recognition software does not only reproduce these prejudices, it amplifies them. In contrast with humans, algorithms cannot fight consciously against acquired prejudices. As artificial intelligence gradually invades our lives, the issues will only increase. If robots are used to model the world in the near future, it is vital that they should be programmed by men and women.

The idea is clearly not to say that women would be better scientists than men, but rather to become conscious that we need a more balanced scientific community in terms of gender representation, so as not to deprive ourselves of everyone's creativity and talent, and to design, through scientific progress, a more inclusive society. Creating coalitions for a more inclusive science is urgent, in order to best address the challenges facing the world, while advancing knowledge for the benefit of all.

The world needs science, and science, more than ever, needs women.

The author is executive vice-president of the L'Oréal Foundation.

Most Viewed in 24 Hours
Top
BACK TO THE TOP
English
Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
主站蜘蛛池模板: 久久成人在线视频 | 亚洲91 | 精品欧美一区二区三区 | 91精品国产91久久综合 | 91嫩草精品 | 99午夜高清在线视频在观看 | 色婷婷综合久久久中字幕精品久久 | 99在线观看精品 | 欧美成人精品久久精品 | 久久国产亚洲欧美日韩精品 | 欧美一级久久 | 九一免费国产 | 日韩高清一区 | 一级午夜a毛片免费视频 | 国产日韩欧美 | 精品国产一区二区三区成人影院 | 总攻调教各种受肉 | 91成人免费看 | 91视频高清 | 国产精品国产成人国产三级 | 天天操夜夜操天天操 | 久久久久久亚洲 | 欧美午夜精品久久久久免费视 | 久久精品亚洲欧美日韩精品中文字幕 | 国产免费www| 久草视频在线首页 | 成人国产网站 | 色屁屁www影院免费观看软件 | 亚洲色图综合图片 | 日韩 欧美 国产 亚洲 中文 | 国产99久久精品一区二区 | 欧美成人看片黄a免费看 | 久久精品视香蕉蕉er大臿蕉 | 欧美精品国产制服第一页 | 超碰在线国产 | 亚洲好视频| 午夜视频色 | 成年人在线播放视频 | 国产亚洲精品sese在线播放 | 久久精品小视频 | 91se在线看片国产免费观看 |