日韩精品久久一区二区三区_亚洲色图p_亚洲综合在线最大成人_国产中出在线观看_日韩免费_亚洲综合在线一区

Global EditionASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
Business
Home / Business / Finance

Real economy shielded from systemic risks

By CHEN JIA | China Daily | Updated: 2018-07-20 08:05
Share
Share - WeChat
Aerial photo taken on May 4, 2018 shows an automatic container dock in Qingdao, East China's Shandong province. [Photo/Xinhua]

Financial systemic risks were stimulated in the first half of this year due to Sino-US trade friction, as well as the overlapping effect of domestic financial deleveraging in a tightened regulatory environment, but the real economic sectors have been isolated from the risk, said research published on Thursday.

The index, monitoring 202 listed companies in the financial and property sectors, is calculated by researchers to indicate financial systemic risk under some extreme scenarios.

It jumped sharply this year, especially since March when Sino-US trade tensions emerged and Chinese financial regulators issued new regulations to curb shadow banking financing activities, said Zhou Hao, a professor at Tsinghua University's PBC School of Finance.

Similar surges in the index could be seen during the 2008 global financial crisis and the financial market turbulence in mid-2015, when the index jumped even higher than the warning level.

"This time, the index is still under the warning line, meaning the risk is controllable without hurting the real economy so far," Zhou told China Daily.

"But we still need to pay attention to the potential influences and prevent financing difficulties for small business in the second half, as tight financial regulation is expected to continue."

He suggested to maintain a prudent and neutral monetary policy stance in the second half along with financial deleveraging, but moderate policy fine-tuning is required to ease liquidity stress among financial institutions.

The trade tensions, meanwhile, could be seen as the direct factor that resulted in pessimistic expectations on future policy and economic uncertainties among investors. The negative effects were first shown in the earlier stock market fluctuations.

Chinese banks have higher risks than insurance and securities companies, and more attention should be paid to joint-stock commercial banks, compared with the five largest State-owned banks and city and rural banks, according to Zhou.

"If the trade tensions continue to escalate in the second half, joint-stock commercial banks will be more fragile, as their nonperforming loans will increase," said Zhou.

He explained that these banks have granted more loans to small and medium-sized enterprises, and have more exposure to interbank market business, or so-called shadow banking.

Tariffs on additional $16 billion of imports were reportedly expected from both China and the United States, when trade tensions rose with the US planning a 10 percent tariff on $200 billion of Chinese imports. The US levied tariffs on $34 billion of Chinese imports starting on June 6 and China announced equal and comparable retaliatory measures following that.

"A numerical estimate of financial implications on a cross-sector basis is uncertain due to the untested nature of trade friction between the world's two largest economies," Alex Griffiths, Fitch Rating's group credit officer in the global corporates department, wrote in recent research.

But the tit-for-tat retaliatory trade actions could raise credit risks for companies in the two countries, especially for those already under pressure, although the vulnerability after the initial tariffs rounds is limited, according to the ratings agency.

"A prolonged trade dispute resulting in weaker GDP growth, higher inflation, increased currency volatility or rapid changes in commodity prices could have wider rating implications," said Griffiths.

Escalating trade protectionism and cascading supply-chain effects could have a disproportionate effect on US corporations, especially large multinational companies such as Boeing, Intel, Deere&Co, Texas Instruments and GE. But most Fitch-rated Chinese corporations would suffer a limited direct impact from US tariffs as they are domestically focused, according to Fitch's research.

Top
BACK TO THE TOP
English
Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
CLOSE
 
主站蜘蛛池模板: 狠狠撸电影院 | 黄a在线 | 欧美高清在线视频一区二区 | 成人av免费 | 成人国产在线 | 精品人妻无码一区二区三区手机板 | 久99视频| 免费特黄一级欧美大片在线看 | 国产美女在线免费观看 | 男人的天堂在线视频 | 欧美free性 | 成人免费精品 | 水中色av综合 | 亚洲欧美在线免费观看 | 久久精品国产99国产精品 | 精品国产不卡一区二区三区 | 欧美日韩一区二区中文字幕 | 天堂在线91 | 欧美成人a∨高清免费观看 毛片特级 | 日韩一区二区三区四区五区 | 亚洲精品a级 | 成人一区二区三区在线观看 | 狠狠的撸2015最新版狠狠的撸2015最新版 | 一区二区三区欧美 | 亚洲国产中文字幕 | 国产精品美女 | 天天色天天色 | 国产99久久精品一区二区永久免费 | 五月色开心婷婷丁香在线 | 96精品专区国产在线观看高清 | 91视频青娱乐 | 欧美日韩亚洲国产 | 99草在线| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区 | 色玖玖| 黄色av免费看 | 日韩欧美在线一区二区三区 | 欧美喷潮久久久xxxxx | 色噜噜影院 | 五月色播影音在线观看 | 色视频在线免费观看 |