中國(guó)網(wǎng)站品牌欄目（頻道）
The People's Daily reported on Monday that the Hubei provincial disciplinary authorities had recently issued a notice forbidding Communist Party and government officials from visiting "business-oriented entertainment venues". The notice comes in the wake of a waitress killing of an official, avowedly to protect herself from rape, in Badong county in the province.
The notice urged all officials in the province to "draw a lesson" from the case, which "has produced a baneful influence on society". The case triggered nationwide concern about the fate of the waitress, whom most people admired for her "courage to defend her integrity and chastity". The public also vented its anger against the officials who allegedly forced the girl to provide "special service", a euphemism for sex.
In Chinese official jargon, "business-oriented entertainment venues" refers to bars or baths that provide services of karaoke, dancing, bathing or massage, usually along with the company of young women, or "Misses", some of whom may provide "special service" on request.
The phrase - "forbidding officials from visiting business-oriented entertainment venues" - may sound very familiar to the public. There had been similar warnings in the past, too, issued by the authorities.
Just 11 days before the Badong case happened, the Hubei provincial committee of the Communist Party and the Hubei provincial government held a video conference on "fighting corruption and building clean government", which all officials above county level attended.
Officials are supposed to have both "moral integrity and professional competence" before they are recruited or promoted. And, keeping away from suggestive entertainment venues is what a man of moral integrity should do. Then, why are so many officials fond of visiting such places? How many of them indulge in such a diversion?
Yesterday, the People's Daily published the responses of 105 officials (of "grassroots organizations of government and the Party in four provinces") to a questionnaire about their spare-time pursuits.
The answers are interesting. Take the question "Why do you visit business-oriented entertainment venues in your spare time?" Close to half (49 percent) cited the "necessity for establishing connections"; 31 percent said that "it was needed for the purpose of fulfilling work requirements"; and 20 percent admitted to the "personal need for relaxation."
The answers are revealing on at least two counts. First, all of these officials have experience of visiting such places. Second, a bulk of them went to such places for "the purpose of work".
Personal integrity aside, the second reason merits discussion. How come that visiting such dubious places has become part of an official's work? Are such visits really an indispensable part of one's work? If true, it is terrible and shocking. Such a trend suggests that the practice has made its way into the routine functioning of grassroots governments.
I still do not believe it, but I have to admit that the problem is serious enough. Besides Hubei province, a few other places have also issued similar notices after the Badong case. Earlier, in March, the Ministry of Public Security put out a similar notice warning officers against patronizing such places.
Earnest, effective, and maybe tough, measures need to be taken to reinforce the ban and punish those who flout the rules.
In the interests of transparency, the public may be invited to monitor the execution of the regulations.
E-mail: [email protected]
About the author:
劉式南 高級(jí)編輯。1968年畢業(yè)于武漢華中師范學(xué)院（現(xiàn)華中師范大學(xué)）英文系。1982年畢業(yè)于北京體育學(xué)院（現(xiàn)北京體育大學(xué)）研究生院體育情報(bào)專(zhuān)業(yè)。1982年進(jìn)入中國(guó)日?qǐng)?bào)社，先后擔(dān)任體育記者、時(shí)政記者、國(guó)際新聞編輯、要聞版責(zé)任編輯、發(fā)稿部主任、《上海英文星報(bào)》總編輯、《中國(guó)商業(yè)周刊》總編輯等職。現(xiàn)任《中國(guó)日?qǐng)?bào)》總編輯助理及專(zhuān)欄作家。1997年獲國(guó)務(wù)院“特殊貢獻(xiàn)專(zhuān)家政府津貼”。2000年被中華全國(guó)新聞工作者協(xié)會(huì)授予“全國(guó)百佳新聞工作者”稱(chēng)號(hào)。2006年獲中國(guó)新聞獎(jiǎng)二等獎(jiǎng)（編輯）。
?相關(guān)閱讀：
Kids should study less, play more
See-through mechanism for officials
Public mood is never to be ignored
Corruption as food for thought
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
